Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #321  
Old 11-19-2019, 02:39 PM
Wurl Wurl is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you're not good enough at Enchanter and mad other people are, and resorting to this... whew.
Actually, we're just trying to make the server more classic.
  #322  
Old 11-19-2019, 02:39 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mushman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Thanks for the info!

So if I understand correctly, the staff made the change to lifetap clickies, knowingly going against classic data for the sake of improving the game?

Just wanted to know if the whole fortress argument of "It is proven classic so it stays" even holds water. It really doesn't though if they've used their judgement in the past.
Once the item recharge bug was discovered, it was quickly fixed. One of the stupidest arguments ever is keeping it in for months or saying it's selectively classic. It should last for a week or two at the end of Velious if you want the "classic experience".
  #323  
Old 11-19-2019, 02:44 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wurl [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Actually, we're just trying to make the server more classic.
Go read about the history of AOW being killed for the first time with charmed mobs. Charm itself wasn't even changed as a result.

Frozen Jesus is frowning hard as hell right now at the whining.
  #324  
Old 11-19-2019, 02:45 PM
derpcake2 derpcake2 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Again, not in an "X is wrong" way, but in a "if you played on live and are honest, you KNOW something isn't right" way.
The logs that were posted from classic resemble p1999 as much as possible.

I wish people would get infractions for posting this kind of pseudo-feedback. It is disruptive and needlessly takes time from staff.

Nilbog isn't here to please your "feels".
  #325  
Old 11-19-2019, 03:06 PM
loramin loramin is offline
Planar Protector

loramin's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by derpcake2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Nilbog isn't here to please your "feels".
No, Nilbog is here to re-create classic EverQuest. And anyone being honest who played back then knows Enchanters here are nothing like they were on live: Nilbog is failing in some sense at re-creating classic EverQuest (and in all fairness, the guy has succeeded at umpteen million other decisions, so this is in no way a personal attack, just a "he's human" point).

It's exactly the same thing with Bards AoEing every mob in The Overthere. Every step, every last decision that Nilbog made which enabled it was absolutely 100% classic and correct ... but a single Bard making it impossible for anyone to get XP in the zone absolutely was not classic.

Even though Nilbog knew he'd made every decision about Bards correctly, he still took a step back and saw that something wasn't right. And that must have been incredibly difficult for him: no one is good at seeing their own mistakes, and if it wasn't for the massive CSR problem the Bards created, I'm not sure he even would have.

But he did! He realized something was missing, and it wasn't any individual game mechanic that he'd gotten wrong: it was that he hadn't considered how significant an "X factor" (1999 latency) was in making an emulated EverQuest server feel like a real EverQuest server.

Once he did, he emulated better. Even though he literally added an unclassic mechanic, the server felt far more classic as a result. Other than Bards who want to XP faster, I don't think anyone can argue the server would be more classic with AoE monopolies in OT.

Similarly, I don't think anyone can honestly argue that P99 really feels like 1999 when NO ONE remembers Enchanter charming being so prevalent, and basic logic dictates that it couldn't have been purely player ignorance.
__________________

Loramin Frostseer, Oracle of the Tribunal <Anonymous> and Fan of the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides
Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue server, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of up to 2k+ platinum! Message me for details.
  #326  
Old 11-19-2019, 03:13 PM
strawman strawman is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by derpcake2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Nilbog isn't here to please your "feels".
Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, Nilbog is here to re-create classic EverQuest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
BUT I FEEL LIKE ENCHANTERS ARE WRONG WAAAAA
  #327  
Old 11-19-2019, 03:19 PM
Bazia Bazia is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,152
Default

nothing classic about being in HHK and theres two charming enchanters in gob basement 2 charming enchanters clearing first floor guards a high level charm enchanter soloing second floor guards
another charming enchanter soloing nobles and yes even another charming enchanter and mage duo clearing third and fourth floor

shits getting stupid real quick
Last edited by Bazia; 11-19-2019 at 03:21 PM..
  #328  
Old 11-19-2019, 03:21 PM
strawman strawman is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kul69 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
>it's silly to argue the "classic" angle
>argues the classic angle three sentences later
  #329  
Old 11-19-2019, 03:47 PM
Mushman Mushman is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 14
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by derpcake2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The logs that were posted from classic resemble p1999 as much as possible.

I wish people would get infractions for posting this kind of pseudo-feedback. It is disruptive and needlessly takes time from staff.

Nilbog isn't here to please your "feels".
People don't agree with me, they should be silenced?

Noone is being disruptive in sharing their opinion that power charm centric EQ isn't classic and takes away from the classic EQ experience.

Taking away time from staff something something Nilbog? It's like you'd say anything to make people speaking honestly go away. The staff is great and we're lucky to have them! Doesn't make charmed state of game classic.
  #330  
Old 11-19-2019, 04:17 PM
Danth Danth is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,271
Default

I (still) can't lifetap raid bosses. Your classic arguments are invalid. Non-classic changes are made when the project admins deem it necessary. For folks who dislike current Enchanter power, continuing to visibly and loudy complain is the best way to eventually bring the admins around to such a change (ie, keep it up). As the recent experience with the pet window demonstrated, the squeaky wheel gets the grease.

Danth
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.