Mage pet nerf 100% bot now....

[Erati]

Originally Posted by Izmael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It seems to reset all slots on the client, but only first slot will actually be reset server-side.

You will get the "spell recast time not met" message on other slots when the spell casting completes.

this - imagine telling someone theyre so wrong when theyre so right [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[starkind]

Originally Posted by Baler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Serious question, would a standard 9mm round even fire in outer space?

[Jimjam]

Guns work by putting bullets in the bullet hole, so deff can come out of the deff hole.

As long as you keep putting the bullets in, you should keep getting deff come out.

Source: Ork physics 101.

[starkind]

The correct answer is yes.

[Saisu]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The most powerful duo according to P99 forums? Enc+Clr. The most powerful duo according to TLP forums? Enc+Clr. The strat? Charm your way to lev 60. TLP makes no mention of “unlike P99 charm breaks are very frequent here” that I’ve ever read.

From what I’ve seen, TLPs are certainly not the same as original launch EverQuest. Here’s a post that states some of the major differences. There’s no telling what year the charm code they are using is from (or code for Charisma, or from which patch, or any number of things). Unfortunately not a great reliable source of info.

[Byrjun]

Imagine playing here for 5+ years and thinking that the devs actually nerf/buff things because of balance and not because they're just trying to get values as close to classic as possible.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Saisu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

From what I’ve seen, TLPs are certainly not the same as original launch EverQuest. Here’s a post that states some of the major differences. There’s no telling what year the charm code they are using is from (or code for Charisma, or from which patch, or any number of things). Unfortunately not a great reliable source of info.

So they’re not a reliable source of info, but apparently posts from random players 21-22 years ago (that are frequently contradicted by random posts from that time frame that say different things) are reliable according to anyone who is grasping at straws trying to find evidence to get charm nerfed lol

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Byrjun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Imagine playing here for 5+ years and thinking that the devs actually nerf/buff things because of balance and not because they're just trying to get values as close to classic as possible.

Well to be fair they HAVE buffed or nerfed things for balance purposes at times in the past...so your comment is simply incorrect

[starkind]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So they’re not a reliable source of info, but apparently posts from random players 21-22 years ago (that are frequently contradicted by random posts from that time frame that say different things) are reliable according to anyone who is grasping at straws trying to find evidence to get charm nerfed lol

99% of us know what random posts were accurate and don't care how easy the game is. So we know it was harder and that it took full groups to reliably do anything outside of killing greens in the open sky world.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

99% of us know what random posts were accurate and don't care how easy the game is. So we know it was harder and that it took full groups to reliably do anything outside of killing greens in the open sky world.

So if random posts are accurate why are there so many that contradict each other lol