#31
|
|||
|
Shaman with Charm...GG
| ||
|
#32
|
|||
|
Not what you said but I always thought that if wizards and mages were completely merged as a class with caps and spells of both classes at once, and even was allowed to dual wield both classes epics, it still wouldnt be as powerful as an enchanter.
| ||
|
#33
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#34
|
|||
|
I'd say True North for any class without True North.
| ||
|
#35
|
|||
|
I've always felt you could completely merge the wizard and mage class. All you'd need to maybe remove is snare or root and the class would be perfectly balanced against enchanters and necros.
| ||
|
#36
|
|||
|
A Mage+Wizard combo class still wouldn't hold a candle to the strength of what an Enchanter can do in most areas of the game.
Consider that in-game right now, a single Enchanter is able to complete more content than a Mage+Wizard duo.
__________________
| ||
|
#37
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Cle/ench duo that has malo? Fd after lull crit fails? Cantata in groups/raids? Torpor for self heal or helping pet without the 10s cast time? Yeah. Quote:
With root/snare, it'd be an enormous improvement for both classes, but still wouldnt be quite as dominant solo or duo as a chanter or necro. But it'd almost certainly be #1 group DPS pick... most of a rogue or monk's DPS but with ports, coth, roots, stuns, malo? OP in that setting. | ||||
Last edited by Tecmos Deception; 03-31-2019 at 12:20 PM..
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
I'd give warriors the ability to use all weapons regardless of any race/class/deity restrictions.
It fits the class description. | ||
|
#40
|
|||
|
Cleric with canni4
| ||
|
|
|