Proposed Player agreement: Stormfeather

[LazyHydras]

Hi.

This is my proposal.


When the current camp holder leaves, whomsoever is there AND ACTIVE when the player leaves is the next campholder.

Priority will be given to the first player who was there AND IS PRESENT WHEN THE CAMPHOLDER leaves.


I understand that this camp has traditionally been a LIST camp like AC.

But this is my proposal in order to circumvent the issues of accusations wherein people claim that a list is maintained of only one's friends (etc, etc).


Agree? Disagree. Discuss below, please.




Thank you.
-Neph / Krystaps

[Fifield]

I have never camped this camp because of how stupid it currently is,

would agree!

[Legidias]

Everyone will have timer anyways so it'll just turn into a shitfest where you roll to camp for 18+ hours

[LazyHydras]

So, to clarify. There and active means. There and not afk (moving around, killing cougars, teabagging other players, w/e) when the current campholder leaves.

[Maschenny]

I don't know what the current rules are, but they seem to be working. Stay as is.

[LazyHydras]

^ you haven't seen the shitshow that has been the past 3 days. Lol. Current rules are: the camp holder makes their own rules. They can be w/e they want.


This is why I made this thread: to establish set rules that aren't subject to whim and caprice, whether those rules are my own or simply a consensus.

[elwing]

That's the regular rules, nothing enforce that this camp has to be a list... The owner decide who's next, lists are shady past the first person in the list tbh... By accepting to get on the list you might be considered has having accepted it and have to enforce it... But that's tenuous at best... And in case of a long ld, for example anyone can claim the camp and all ppl in the list are fucked...

[aaezil]

If the “next” person on the list doesnt show and the previous camp holder is gone that sounds like an unclaimed camp

[Legidias]

SF really doesnt have any special rules. Lore solo camps = move on once item drops. As per ALL camp rules, only the next in line is actually on the list. If no show, its FFA. If you dont attack mob in a timely manner once its spawned, its FFA. None of these are any different rules to any other normal camp in game. This is the same as OOT AC.

There are already set rules. Its the same camp rules as anywhere else.

[LazyHydras]

Originally Posted by Legidias [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

SF really doesnt have any special rules. Lore solo camps = move on once item drops. As per ALL camp rules, only the next in line is actually on the list. If no show, its FFA. If you dont attack mob in a timely manner once its spawned, its FFA. None of these are any different rules to any other normal camp in game. This is the same as OOT AC.

There are already set rules. Its the same camp rules as anywhere else.

Negative. According to what I've been told, the camp holder can set any specific rules he wants. Can hand it to whomever he wants, etc.


I know it seems obvious that once the current campholder leaves then the next person who is there gets it, but it is not yet "set," believe it or not.