#21
|
|||
|
Def was not easy getting 50 as a mage. I did solo from 40-50 though. It really made me get creative and very quantitative with my choices of where to XP. Level 45 wasnt really really bad. I thought 46-48 was where I was going to hit my breaking point.
I personally just hope they dont vendor all the pets.
__________________
Bababooey - 50 Magician
| ||
|
#22
|
|||
|
This whole thing just put in the light the lack of professionalism of the team. It's ok they are "volonteers".
The change they made after beta proved the team is lazy and prone to influence by anyone with half an argument. They have shot right next to their goal and missed the point of the server. They have let a couple of nerds change: Recreating the everquest classic experience To Recreating lines of codes.
__________________
Infernus Draconis
Magician The Drift | ||
|
#23
|
||||
|
Quote:
I personnally am social and played a mage as they are supposed to be played before and its a great and fun experience. Pets serves very well in group ro solo and its what makes this class fun and its how it was designed. All classes have been designed with certain ideas behind them, sadly magician wasnt finished at release and it got fix the minute people got to that content, first they had to confirm because verant hid the fact. Soon as it was proven, they nija patch it the next day. For the record i too wouldnt go on an all vendor solution, but the all research solution wasnt viable or logic either. It is not by chance they put 2 34 pets and 2 39, it breaks the chain and let people start their chain of pets from 34 scrolls or 39 scrolls, removing the need of high level magician to go back to lower level zones and rape the shit out of the place removing exp opportunity for the youngs at the same time. Cheers, lets hope they act, and soon, first boring EQ experince in 20 years.
__________________
Infernus Draconis
Magician The Drift | |||
|
#24
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
Last edited by Tecmos Deception; 12-01-2019 at 03:08 PM..
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
This is going to be a fun thread
| ||
|
#26
|
||||
|
Quote:
edit: I'll go further. If you support no mage pets, why do you support the list system?
__________________
Shenethax - Iksar Shaman
Xerrick - Iksar Necromancer Numdiar - High Elf Mage Zekdos - Troll SK | |||
|
#27
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is why nobody will die of a heart attack because shadowman are in game, it changes nothing to the classic experience. they will all fix these in times and next iteration will be cleaner. There is nothing classic at having tons of mages with no pets passed 34. It never happened during classic.
__________________
Infernus Draconis
Magician The Drift | |||
|
#28
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#29
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm curious, are you saying it used to hit only 4 and then was increased? | |||
|
#30
|
|||||
|
Quote:
So to answer your question ... /list is actually 100% classic, except that it relies on automation instead of requiring (volunteer) GMs to implement it. Back on live lists were absolutely a thing: Quote:
__________________
Loramin Frostseer, Oracle of the Tribunal <Anonymous> and Fan of the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue server, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of up to 2k+ platinum! Message me for details. | ||||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|