#5271
|
||||
|
Quote:
F-4 phantom was a really good jet for its day, and would not entirely suck in a modern dog fight, but the iranians don't have any modern upgrades | |||
#5272
|
|||
|
this war in ukraine seems to imply that unless you have the full force of the american military behind you you cant fly much.
I dont understand why we were able to dominate the air in iraq and Afghanistan but russia cant keep anything up there. | ||
#5273
|
|||
|
| ||
#5274
|
||||
|
Quote:
That or Ukraine just fucking sucks. | |||
#5275
|
|||
|
Ukraine v Russia is a retard fight for sure
| ||
#5277
|
||||
|
Quote:
the F-22 has excellent radar defeat properties, the pilot would have to make mistakes in his profile and then fail to correct them there's a good reason why the U.S. military will sell ANYTHING except an F-22 | |||
#5278
|
||||
|
Quote:
I chose 300 because Ukraine has those. So it's like a automatic no fly zone for shitty Russian aircraft. | |||
#5279
|
|||
|
idk why they dont just try a nuke out at this point
| ||
#5280
|
||||
|
Quote:
info on full capabilites of S-400 is still unclear. "Stealth" aircraft aren't immune to radar, its a misnomer because it sounds cool. They are a combination of systems, materials and tactics that make an aircraft "stealth" stuff like radar absorption, radar reflection, aircraft characteristics, electromagnetic interference and flight profile altogether contribute to radar defeat, making a "stealth" aircraft. So any anti-aircraft system reliant on high frequency radar to target an aircraft, is gonna have trouble with any of the 5th+ gen fighters. unless the russians came up with some ground breaking new sensor tech, then the S-400 is just a faster version of the S-300, which I doubt, because the S-300 system kept generals awake at night back in the 80s, and since then every aircraft we developed has been "Stealth" | |||
Last edited by Trexller; 02-11-2023 at 01:49 AM..
|
|
|