#1
|
|||
|
so let me get this straight...Canni II>Canni III?
wut do?
why would they do this? | ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
The level 56 undead cleric nuke is less efficient than the lvl 44 one too.
__________________
Butchh | Facetious | Knockers Jayce | Briefs | Squash | ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Cani 3 actually gives 46 mana for 100 health. Just tested. Wiki wrong, cani 3 ftw.
__________________
Showa - Necro
Made - Monk Maud - Shaman Agoraphobia - Rogue Refund - Enchanter Stryche - Shadow Knight (Current toon) <Azure Guard> | ||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Member of <Divinity>
Estuk Flamebringer - 60 Gnomish Wizard | Kaam Armnibbler - 55 Ogre Shaman | Aftadae Roaminfingers - 54 Halfling Rogue Aftadai Beardhammer - 50 Dwarven Cleric | Aftae Greenbottom - 49 Halfling Druid Need a port or a rez? Hit me up on IRC! | |||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
Exile is better immediately at 55 and only gets better on the way to 60. Banish (44) is 585 dd for 225 mana = 2.6 damage/mana ratio Exile (55) is 675 (@55) for 250 mana = 2.7 damage/mana ratio Exile (55) is 725 (@60) for 250 mana = 2.9 damage/mana ratio | |||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Hmm, for some reason I thought Exile was 300 mana. I just logged in and verified those mana costs are correct though, both on wiki and in-game.
__________________
Butchh | Facetious | Knockers Jayce | Briefs | Squash | ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Since nobody is saying anything I guess I'll be the one...
46 mana for 100 health is not better than 36 mana for 67 health(Canni3 vs. Canni2). Canni2 > Canni3 in terms of 'which spell gives me the most mana for each HP expended' | ||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
It's about mana per Cast, not mana per HP, since at 60 (with money) regen is a non-issue. | |||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Yeah absolutely, once you have torpor it makes sense to ignore efficiency.
| ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Canni 3 is less tedious to use constantly and works great with a fungi or torpor but i can see the concern without it. Even if i had no fungi id still use canni 3 , cannibalizing to me is the most tedious and annoying parts of playing shaman, but obviously is great nonetheless
| ||
|
|
|