Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 09-01-2021, 01:08 AM
Tunabros Tunabros is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2018
Location: California, United States
Posts: 3,346
Default Should there really be a red 2.0? The age old question

Blue: Filled with raid drama + vulak DKP farmers
Green: "it's alright" (send quake pls)
Red: Drug users + boxers

Here's the problem: people won't stop being cringe and asking for red 2.0!

Why red is fine by itself

-People are still playing on it
-Peak 50 population
-No actual reason to delete it

Why do people not want to play it?

-It's filled with drug users
-No one wants to get ganked by 4 (one of them is a boxed cleric) overweight middle-age men and get yellowtexted to the whole server
-"low population"

Remember when red was fun?

-200-300 peak population
-Empire + Ragnorok days??
-People actually pvp with honor? (mostly)

Solution to "Red 2.0":

1. Delete red entirely and tell them to piss off to rise of zek
2. Do nothing and let them complain on forums for all eternity

Devs are based

Thanks for reading
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.