Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 11-16-2019, 03:27 PM
Juntsie Juntsie is offline
Aviak

Juntsie's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Grobb
Posts: 65
Default

Juntsie emerge from long slumber and review da record. Herein document post by BWE prove dat chanta charm NOT CLASSIC.

Juntsie hereby move for da remedial CLASSIC ACTION.
__________________
/s/
Juntsie Grobbstein (Green)
Juntsie Professional & Shaman Services, LLC
Licensed Troll Professional (J.D., M.D., Th.D., R.D., R.C.C., Ph.D., C.P.A., L.S.L.P)
Known Associates: Oakenhops Valebrewer (51 Druid <Dial a Port>); Korezril (50 Monk <Ancient Blood>) ; Xeirella L'Veldriss (52 Necro)


Professional troll services fer gud rates, including da raid dispute resolution. Dis message confidential and not intended for tax purpose. Protect swamp. Tink green before print.
  #102  
Old 11-16-2019, 03:27 PM
strawman strawman is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's really not, because If it was it being broken wouldn't be as large an issue.

Everyone is abusing it now.
Are you saying it must be easy because so many people are crying about it on the forum?
  #103  
Old 11-16-2019, 03:41 PM
mycoolrausch mycoolrausch is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bwe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is a huge find
It even indirectly supports the idea that enchanter charm is OP on p99. If nobody here even remembers not using invis breaks in classic they weren't charm XPing, probably because charm sucked? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #104  
Old 11-16-2019, 03:43 PM
strawman strawman is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mycoolrausch [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It even indirectly supports the idea that enchanter charm is OP on p99. If nobody here even remembers not using invis breaks in classic they weren't charm XPing, probably because charm sucked? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No it doesn't, you'd just spend a little more mana to break with dispel instead of invis
  #105  
Old 11-16-2019, 03:44 PM
Deliverator Deliverator is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 180
Default

I literally started charming sirens in oot at 16 on live 3 weeks into kunark. Then aviaks in SK and at Arena entrance in lake rathe. I was soloing with charm on an enchanter in 2000...
  #106  
Old 11-16-2019, 03:46 PM
Ligma Ligma is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 180
Default

Quote:
I never really cared about how OP they were until that green naggy kill, that SINGLE imp protector who didnt break once the entire engage and did half the raid dps triggered the fuck out of me lol
With tash, malo, junk buffs and a whole group to coordinate charm on discord. No one coordinated in that way back in the day. In that sense, yes it's not classic.
  #107  
Old 11-16-2019, 03:58 PM
Meiva Meiva is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 392
Default

It also mentions changing Charm rules in The Hole to Kunark-era. What does that mean?
  #108  
Old 11-16-2019, 04:02 PM
byzah byzah is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 4
Default

Eye witness evidence counts as evidence in criminal trials - so here's some more.

I played an enchanter in Classic - Kunark & used charm extensively but mostly as a backup spell. It was fantastic in Unrest in the 20s as a CC spell to deal with mez breaks. Mez breaks were very common back then as few players knew how to assist...

(Lv12 Charm had a 2.0s cast time...later versions are slower, so harder to get off when you're getting pounded & of course mobs hit harder even with stuns).

I recall Inviz *did* break Charm (just as it causes permanent pets to suicide).

Charm was also useful situationally when close to a zone line [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We didn't know tricks like tashing the charm pet [though I tashed all mobs after mez] or giving the charm pet -MR items [assuming that even works on p1999 as it does on Live now].

I think the biggest difference is that today the ENTIRE TEAM works to support the charm strategy. Mages & Shamans are ready to malo. Tanks/rangers are ready to taunt (only). Necros will toss in a Screaming Terror...healers will heal you. You will actually be HP buffed.

All changes from "back in the day" where teamwork was much less effective.

Back then, I never received hp buffs from clerics (or thought to ask for them) until high levels and when I later switched mains to cleric, I recall watching an enchanter die in PoN as he was extensively using charm and I had no idea why he was being so reckless...

(I did feel sorry for him after rezzing him back in and even blew a pearl on a DI spell)
  #109  
Old 11-16-2019, 04:04 PM
strawman strawman is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kul69 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
this thread has revealed magic resist rate is off
There was one 1999 post of an enchanter complaining that Chaotic Feedback resists a lot, which is a stun resist check, not magic resist. That doesn't "reveal that magic resist rate is off"
  #110  
Old 11-16-2019, 04:08 PM
strawman strawman is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 73
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kul69 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just a reminder that this thread is past the point of proving if this is "classic." Enchanters need a nerf just for being OP same as Necro and other classes that have been nerfed.
What was the nerf to necro?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.