Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Priests

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2017, 02:13 PM
tobolamr tobolamr is offline
Kobold

tobolamr's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Middle of Nowhere, Wisconsin
Posts: 125
Default Necro Spell Inquiry

Does the spell: Conglaciation of Bone actually exist in P1999?

And Sedulous Subversion is the other spell I never seem to find. I finally started asking other necromancers who are level 59 or 60 if they have them, and have yet to find one. Not a HUGE deal, but just curious if those spells are out there or not.

Thank you kindly!
  #2  
Old 10-23-2017, 02:37 PM
Spyder73 Spyder73 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: 36th Chamber
Posts: 1,901
Default

Twitch spell yes - DD spell I have not seen. Might be a Chardok revamp spell
  #3  
Old 10-23-2017, 02:55 PM
Pyrocat Pyrocat is offline
Planar Protector

Pyrocat's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,937
Default

Chill Bones exists, I don't think the non-illusion one does though.

Sedulous Subversion also exists it's just somewhat rare.

Also this is the priest subforum, not the int caster one.
__________________
Pyrocat the Protector of Vul
Proud member of The Safehouse since 2000
Pyrocat (60 TRL SHM) Orochi (60 IKS NEC)
  #4  
Old 10-24-2017, 01:06 AM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 3,742
Default

Highest level twitch is worth seeking out. It's a lot more efficient than the one before it.

400:150 (2.66 to one) vs 300:100 (3 to 1)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
  #5  
Old 10-24-2017, 04:31 AM
Jmcwrestling Jmcwrestling is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 521
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Highest level twitch is worth seeking out. It's a lot more efficient than the one before it.

400:150 (2.66 to one) vs 300:100 (3 to 1)
Wouldn't that technically be less efficient
__________________
Eberron 60 Erudite Enchanter <Awakenend>
Enjamin 60 Erudite Cleric <Awakenend>
Yxarus 60 Iksar Warrior <Awakened>
Fauvana 54 Erudite Necromancer
Seliel 24 Erudite Rogue
Deepwalter 6 Erudite Paladin


Fauvano 40 Dark Elf Necromancer
Stoppinswords 11 Dark Elf Warrior
  #6  
Old 10-24-2017, 06:50 AM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 3,742
Default

No.

For 300 mana you can give someone 100 mana.

Or

For 400 mana (33% more spell cost) you can give someone 150 (50% more mana).

Highest level twitch is both most potent and most efficient.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
  #7  
Old 10-24-2017, 12:04 PM
Siberious Siberious is offline
Sarnak

Siberious's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 274
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jmcwrestling [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wouldn't that technically be less efficient
3,000 (Mana pool) ÷ 300 (cast cost) = 10 casts * 100 = 1,000 Mana Given
3,000 (Mana pool) ÷ 400 (cast cost) = 7.5 casts * 150 = 1,125 Mana Given

Also casting less often is also very nice and more effective in getting clerics enough Mana for cheals during a chain.
__________________
https://s10.postimg.org/oxx012cbt/ag_borogovia_1a.jpg
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:31 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.