Item linking is not classic

[silo32]

Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not in this case. Links could be taken out via a couple different methods. We experimentally played with disabling them during the course of UI work. The P1999 admins want links left in because they feel it reduces scamming and hence their own CS workload.

Danth

so its not classic but makes life easier on devs

but the other changes pet windows, cycle targeting, etc that don't benefit players are certainly removed because "classic"

lmao

cherry picking at its core

[Razdeline]

Actually was thinking about this the other day. If links were removed, would prices on items generally go down as a result of the hassle with posting items? Would more conversations between players emerge as a result of no item definitions in the links?

[Baler]

Originally Posted by Obrae [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

look at the hypocrites apostles of selectively classic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look at the people who want chaos for the staff, spam in EC and to troll anyone who says otherwise. Get down off your high horse.

To any of the classic purists.... Titanium Client.. now back off

Originally Posted by Razdeline [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Actually was thinking about this the other day. If links were removed, would prices on items generally go down as a result of the hassle with posting items?

No, people would just spam the shit out of EC more.
Then people would cry more about text parsers.

---
Cazic H Thule people, open your eyes and quit rolling troll on the forums.

[Obrae]

Originally Posted by Baler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look at the people who want chaos for the staff, spam in EC and to troll anyone who says otherwise. Get down off your high horse.

To any of the classic purists.... Titanium Client.. now back off


No, people would just spam the shit out of EC more.
Then people would cry more about text parsers.

---
Cazic H Thule people, open your eyes and quit rolling troll on the forums.

i like links, just pointing out you are all hypocrites for attacking selectively classic shit that dont hit you guys.

[FungusTrooper]

half the time i can't tell if baler is a real person

[Razdeline]

Originally Posted by Baler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look at the people who want chaos for the staff, spam in EC and to troll anyone who says otherwise. Get down off your high horse.


No, people would just spam the shit out of EC more.
Then people would cry more about text parsers.

---
Cazic H Thule people, open your eyes and quit rolling troll on the forums.

Or more use of acronyms. fbss, ssoy, pgt, etc. etc. Which would mean less spam. I'm sure the community would look down on the spam you suggest.

[Baler]

Originally Posted by FungusTrooper [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

half the time i can't tell if baler is a real person

At least I'm not an uggo daniel!
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

just a joke

[Bazia]

its not classic if you arent looking into someones bags to see their wares

[oldhead]

Originally Posted by AgentEpilot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think linking wont ruin the classic feel its nicer to click an item than have tunnel chat stuff spam filled with stats.

Mages having pets on vendors would not hurt it either. Classic is classic tho

[oldhead]

Originally Posted by silo32 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

so its not classic but makes life easier on devs

but the other changes pet windows, cycle targeting, etc that don't benefit players are certainly removed because "classic"

lmao

cherry picking at its core

Selectively classic.