******Official politics thread ******

[DinoTriz2]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hotwheels is the creator, Jim is just some pedo that bought the site, dumbshit.

Creator, owner, whatever.

They still broke into his home.

I'm going to assume you're fine with journalists committing crimes because someone held up an okay hand sign.

[DinoTriz2]

Mainstream Leftists and Corporations are openly calling for violence against the Right

[Caldwin]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Copper Cab is amazing

Honestly, I think both sides were being jerks.

[Caldwin]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Journalism or Activism? You decide [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Orwell's newspeak in action.

[Caldwin]

Originally Posted by DinoTriz2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Mainstream Leftists and Corporations are openly calling for violence against the Right

So, to the far left, anything that doesn't agree with their agenda is violence (or at least hate speech). If hate speech was illegal, who would define it? Some Orwellian entity? Would acceptable language be constantly changing, like with newspeak? Would the "truth" be changing, like with the Ministry of Truth? Seems we're well on our way to Orwell's 1984.

The 1st amendment isn't there to protect popular speech. Popular speech doesn't need protecting. The 1st amendment is there to protect unpopular speech, even speech considered by some as "hate speech".

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Caldwin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, to the far left, anything that doesn't agree with their agenda is violence (or at least hate speech). If hate speech was illegal, who would define it? Some Orwellian entity? Would acceptable language be constantly changing, like with newspeak? Would the "truth" be changing, like with the Ministry of Truth? Seems we're well on our way to Orwell's 1984.

The 1st amendment isn't there to protect popular speech. Popular speech doesn't need protecting. The 1st amendment is there to protect unpopular speech, even speech considered by some as "hate speech".

i haven't read orwell, is it about the government censorship or people laughing at your dumb hick opinions?

[DMN]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i haven't read orwell, is it about the government censorship or people laughing at your dumb hick opinions?

It contains the knowledge of why people like you become permacucks.

[Cecily]

Originally Posted by Caldwin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Orwell's newspeak in action.

Not sure why anyone would have a problem with language that sounds scarier to address the fact our planet is on fire.

[Wonkie]

style guides are like, grammar lessons

don't get hot and bothered about the bbc's

jk do what ya wanna [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Caldwin]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not sure why anyone would have a problem with language that sounds scarier to address the fact our planet is on fire.

Because it isn't a fact our planet is on fire. We're entering a cooling phase due to a grand solar minimum. Also, CO2 has very little to do with climate, other than more CO2 greens the planet.