Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

View Poll Results: Do you live in one of America's inner cities?
Yes, I live in a but I got inner city 41 18.55%
Yes, I live in a crime infested inner city 35 15.84%
Yes, I live in a burning crime infested inner city 33 14.93%
Bush burned the crime infested towers 153 69.23%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 221. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #13411  
Old 07-02-2018, 04:14 PM
DinoTriz DinoTriz is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 950
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
DNC says its getting rid of superdelegates which, is actually a pretty big deal.
This is actually a smart move on their part. Fuck.
  #13412  
Old 07-02-2018, 04:17 PM
maskedmelonpai maskedmelonpai is offline
Fire Giant

maskedmelonpai's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Left hand of the Master
Posts: 695
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
math says otherwise. google the numbers.

e: looks like i didn't read your post. any evidence for the assertion?
no, it was just a clever induction on behalf of my cleverableness ^^

*showers self gratuitously with undue accolades*


it could be right though, but so could you.


e: i have anecdotes though. lemme introduce exhibit A: #nevertrump
  #13413  
Old 07-02-2018, 04:18 PM
mickmoranis mickmoranis is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 5,664
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DinoTriz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is actually a smart move on their part. Fuck.
I wouldn't hold your breath.

On one hand it will give dems the ability to wag their finger even harder at people who are not supportive of the party "SEE WE DO WHAT YOU WANT WERE GOOD SEE!" which, will turn away voters that are thinking of coming back because of this decision in the first place.

But the reality is, the fine print, and their role in the primary, may not change. Lets wait and see.
  #13414  
Old 07-02-2018, 04:38 PM
DinoTriz DinoTriz is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 950
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
any evidence for the assertion?
If you're comparing the 2016 and 2012 elections, Trump improved upon Romney's numbers and Clinton failed to meet Obama's numbers.

The key areas where this happened were Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin and Indiana.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspi.../#392190211661

Your voters can turn into Independents (or "traitors") real quick if you ignore them long enough.
  #13415  
Old 07-02-2018, 04:42 PM
mickmoranis mickmoranis is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 5,664
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #13416  
Old 07-02-2018, 04:49 PM
Wonkie Wonkie is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DinoTriz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you're comparing the 2016 and 2012 elections, Trump improved upon Romney's numbers and Clinton failed to meet Obama's numbers.

The key areas where this happened were Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin and Indiana.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspi.../#392190211661

Your voters can turn into Independents (or "traitors") real quick if you ignore them long enough.
Trump gained less than Clinton lost, as compared to 2012. More stayed home than appeared to switch sides. Turnout.
  #13417  
Old 07-02-2018, 04:54 PM
DinoTriz DinoTriz is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 950
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Trump gained less than Clinton lost, as compared to 2012. More stayed home than appeared to switch sides. Turnout.
Did you read the article?
  #13418  
Old 07-02-2018, 05:00 PM
Wonkie Wonkie is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DinoTriz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Did you read the article?
I did not. Giving it a glance now it looks like Forbes doesn't know what population growth is. Closed.
  #13419  
Old 07-02-2018, 05:02 PM
DinoTriz DinoTriz is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 950
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiouxNation [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Were you listening to the dudes story?
Yes.

Clinton missed Obama's numbers by 70,000

Trump gained over 2 million past Romney.

Turnout in 2016 was 0.9% less than 2012.
  #13420  
Old 07-02-2018, 05:03 PM
DinoTriz DinoTriz is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 950
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I did not. Giving it a glance now it looks like Forbes doesn't know what population growth is. Closed.
Lol face it, man. You're wrong.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.