Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Rants and Flames

View Poll Results: should the server have a hands off/no rules policy?
yes, personal responsibility and playerbase solving own problems 29 60.42%
no, i am a moron and plan to vote for obama 19 39.58%
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 02-25-2012, 12:26 AM
Lulz Sect Lulz Sect is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: GuK
Posts: 714
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Null [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Perhaps a /ready command that both raid forces need to type before engaging in Fear PvP?
  #22  
Old 02-25-2012, 12:33 AM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,176
Default

when raid elitist gm over a red server. shits bound to be fucked. put someone who has pvped outside the arena in charge of this server or FFA this bitch.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
  #23  
Old 02-25-2012, 12:42 AM
stormlord stormlord is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,165
Default

I voted no because there're a lot of cases where nobody can right a wrong. There're exploits and mechanics that just do not have an opposite. It's not as straight forward and malleable as reality is. In reality there's a equal and opposite reaction for everything. But in games it's hit and miss and filled with holes.

Also keep in mind that whatever problems classic had we inherit.

However, I would prefer to only have rules for the most extreme cases. This is pvp. You can over-rule a server. Makes your job harder and makes hte atmosphere feel suffocating for players.

How does Eve-Online handle griefing?
__________________
Full-Time noob. Wipes your windows, joins your groups.

Raiding: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...&postcount=109
P1999 Class Popularity Chart: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...7&postcount=48
P1999 PvP Statistics: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...9&postcount=59

"Global chat is to conversation what pok books are to travel, but without sufficient population it doesn't matter."
Last edited by stormlord; 02-25-2012 at 12:48 AM..
  #24  
Old 02-25-2012, 12:53 AM
hagard hagard is offline
Planar Protector

hagard's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,084
Default

At least she's not locking chars during pvp lol
  #25  
Old 02-25-2012, 12:55 AM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

Eve supports and condones griefing, and exploiting.

Not possible to compare Eve to EQ. Eve was designed for pure pvp. EQ added it after, with no regard to its implementation.
  #26  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:03 AM
Palemoon Palemoon is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ninjalooting, trade ganking, scamming, training, xp lossing, stranding warriors in hate and so on should. imo be approached with a hands off tough shit mindset as they were on sullon (and for all but training, on rz as well)

tired of seeing/hearing about the latest ruling on what is or is not allowed and the various shades of gray cast as a result, the only truly fair ruleset is no ruleset.
No, this is classic everquest not your personal torture chamber.

Keep it Classic
  #27  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:11 AM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ninjalooting, trade ganking, scamming, training, xp lossing, stranding warriors in hate and so on should. imo be approached with a hands off tough shit mindset as they were on sullon (and for all but training, on rz as well)

tired of seeing/hearing about the latest ruling on what is or is not allowed and the various shades of gray cast as a result, the only truly fair ruleset is no ruleset.
TD;DR (too dumb; didn't read)
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #28  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:11 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Palemoon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, this is classic everquest not your personal torture chamber.

Keep it Classic
everything i mentioned IS classic to have GMs not interfere.
  #29  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:18 AM
Palemoon Palemoon is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
everything i mentioned IS classic to have GMs not interfere.
Wrong and Nellodee/softcore PK already pointed all this out to you months ago.

You see what you want to see from behind your hannibal lecter mask.
  #30  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:19 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Palemoon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wrong and Nellodee/softcore PK already pointed all this out to you months ago.

You see what you want to see from behind your hannibal lecter mask.
sorry, but i dont need morons from some carebear server to "correct" me

the only thing that was against the rules out of what i mentioned was training, and that was on RZ and everyone did it anyway.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.