NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[arvidez]

Originally Posted by Sadre Spinegnawer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If Trump, then Trump; If Trump and trannies, then trannies; If Trump and trannies and Hunter Biden, then laptop


Just keeping track of the machinery.

Someone used the phrase "biological reality" and wasn't using it in reference to the fact we are not lithovores. So many angry Amish on this thread.

caught all the nazis? now you amish hunting hat is on?

[Ooloo]

Haha what a bunch of horse shit. Once you doofuses start complaining about muslim intolerance of the transgender community I might believe you actually have firm principles or values.

I think muslims and christians are both correct to oppose it, but you only ever call out the easy one.

[Origen]

Lemme know when America becomes a muslim majority country, transphobe

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lemme know when America becomes a muslim majority country, transphobe

So it has to be muslim majority to critique the social attitudes of muslim majority communities within america?

This is the hilariously stupid problem with intersectionality.

[misterbonkers]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lemme know when America becomes a muslim majority country, transphobe

it already is in his mind

[Ooloo]

Boy you guys sure do make lots of great posts, such as "ur dumb" and also "ur a transphobe".

Still no answer as to why you only attack christians for being transphobic. Here I'll help you out:

A principle is a thing that is supposed to be unwavering and unchanging. When you waffle on it, it's not really a principle anymore and thus all your moral outrage when you claim it's being violated rings hollow.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Boy you guys sure do make lots of great posts, such as "ur dumb" and also "ur a transphobe".

Still no answer as to why you only attack christians for being transphobic. Here I'll help you out:

A principle is a thing that is supposed to be unwavering and unchanging. When you waffle on it, it's not really a principle anymore and thus all your moral outrage when you claim it's being violated rings hollow.

Not labeling anyone any pronouns, now against forum rules.

I don't think anyone is ONLY attacking Christians but why do you only want them targeted? Do you need a tangent?

Thou, I will reiterate:

Transgender can be found all over the globe. Older Americans never had a problem with it until their Christian base needed another renergizing - crusading narrative pushed on them by their political party.

[Landroval]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lemme know when America becomes a muslim majority country, transphobe

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...rchid=26343871

A search for the term "Origen" nets results indicating you are attempting to Smurf from the lexicon of Gwaihir

[Ooloo]

What I'm saying is that anyone can do the easy thing (criticizing christians). It might have been brave to criticize christians in the year 1680 or whatever, but it's basically the coolest thing you can do now.

Muslims tend to have much more socially conservative attitudes especially with regard to sex and gender roles, but they're also a "protected class" according to intersectionality, so it short-circuits the modern lib mind when they might actually have to criticize muslims. It betrays their cowardice and doublethink that they won't do it.

It's very much in line with the lib stance on free speech; they'll say they love it when it's stuff they agree with, the tricky part is sticking up for it when it's the stuff you don't like. It's a very simple test that is great for sussing out the nascent dictators among us.

[Landroval]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What I'm saying is that anyone can do the easy thing (criticizing christians). It might have been brave to criticize christians in the year 1680 or whatever, but it's basically the coolest thing you can do now.

Muslims tend to have much more socially conservative attitudes especially with regard to sex and gender roles, but they're also a "protected class" according to intersectionality, so it short-circuits the modern lib mind when they might actually have to criticize muslims. It betrays their cowardice and doublethink that they won't.

It's very much in line with the lib stance on free speech; they'll say they love it when it's stuff they agree with, the tricky part is sticking up for it when it's the stuff you don't like. It's a very simple test that is great for sussing out the nascent dictators among us.

It doesn't help that the vast majority of contemporary Christians are biblically illiterate, and allow bad actors to draw them into debate defending deliberately constructed strawmen of the faith.