#731
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
As for being disruptive, he's the best communicator on this site and frankly the most intelligent, at least as far as I can tell from somewhere lower on the scale. Honestly BB, you should be ashamed of hanging out in our den of losers. | ||||
|
#732
|
|||
|
No I was responding that he claimed it was empirical science. It is quite literally not even science. The only people that say that are pushers of successive breeding in human society, the absolute most hard core of racists.
If you want to know what is science, look up synthetic biology, the great thing about actual science is its actually all inclusive! Edit: about that bit you thought I missed, based off his other posts, I thought he was saying that was a good thing. All I'm saying is eugenics is not science its hand wavy victorian garbage experimentation. | ||
Last edited by Jibartik; 10-04-2020 at 03:42 PM..
|
|
#733
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#734
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think the goal of eugenics at first to rid us of disease is noble, but I literally do not know where I'd stand on these issues if I was holding any type of keys to it. I think I would chose the right thing but have no idea if I really would. Edit: ...Although if I walked into an asylum to see the "latest and greatest" with eugenics in 1902, Id promptly do a 180 and start writing papers about its beyond immoral practices I'm pretty sure I'm too squeamish for that no mater what timeline Im in lol | |||
Last edited by Jibartik; 10-04-2020 at 03:36 PM..
|
|
#735
|
|||
|
| ||
|
#736
|
||||
|
Quote:
Edit: Although, if when I was in the waiting room of the asylum and I saw these classifications on the bulletin: Retards: 1. Sara 2. James Idiots: 1. Richard 2. Mark 3. Geniva Nitwits 1. Jim 2. Clark etc I'd have probably lost my shit laughing and they would have kicked me out before I got to see anymore. | |||
Last edited by Jibartik; 10-04-2020 at 03:40 PM..
|
|
#737
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#738
|
|||
|
all your posts are stupid jibartik
| ||
|
|
|