#31
|
||||
|
Quote:
I duo'd Iksar MNK/SHM with a friend of mine, and by the time we hit 57 I thoroughly regretted my decision and wished I had gone SHD instead of MNK. We were trying to do dungeon crawls and my ability to tank became too much of an issue. Threat was difficult between slows, dots and heals, and even with a Fungi and decent twinkage, the MNK just needed too many heals. God forbid we got into any trouble because the MNK has practically zero ability to contribute anything beyond MOAR PUNCH! A torpor SHM with a well geared SHD can duo practically anything. Yes a MNK would do well, but for what a SHM needs/wants to succeed the most, being able to hold agro and take the hits is FAR more useful than a slightly faster time-to-kill. I think the best argument here is that there are no things a MNK can do that a SHD cannot, even if the kill takes longer. However, there ARE targets that a MNK could not tank for the SHM but a SHD could handle easily. Their DPS doesn't add up to enough of a difference to overcome their lack of agro, utility and damage mitigation. | |||
|
#32
|
||||
|
Quote:
You are quite possibly the only person on P99 that would even try to argue SK > Monk for duo w/ a shaman. | |||
|
#33
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The great wave is coming. Praise be to Prexus!
| |||
|
#34
|
||||
|
Quote:
Danth | |||
|
#35
|
|||
|
Whats the magelo of this 57+ shaman monk duo?
| ||
|
#36
|
|||
|
When I leveled a shaman I felt the best partners were warriors. Once mobs are slowed anything can tank them so what a shaman needs for a partner is dps. Both warriors and monks provide good dps but monks re really really slow pullers and eventually you’ll just start pulling rooms full of mobs and have the shaman root and slow each of them. Warrior much better in this scenario...esp once you are comfortable with keeping the warrior in berserker mode
| ||
Last edited by Stroboo; 01-28-2021 at 03:47 PM..
Reason: Autocorrect>me
|
|
|
|