Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:29 PM
Pudge Pudge is offline
Planar Protector

Pudge's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,517
Default

so many ppl against exp death... i liked exp death for the 1 reason that it would deter bind rushing. assuming bind rushing is legal, then it could make it a risk vs reward. right now, the way you bros are talking, no YT, no exp loss... what reason is there not to rush>?

No YT?
seriously.. no YT is dumb. if some crew is porting around making a name for themselves, well then.. they have! The rest of the server can make the decision as to whether these guys are douches and should be killed, or whether they are white knights, selecting their targets and cleaning out the scum.

i do however agree that YT on someone 8 levels below you is a little much; YT is a reward on its own, and perhaps only YT on those who are within 4 levels, or only YT if the person getting killed is 45+, is best.

Also something we are forgetting is strategic info. Even if you are in a guild v guild fight, and in vent, it's still helpful to see who is dying when, and where.

like searyx said, basically every pvp game announces when you kill someone.. and this doesnt make ppl stop playing them.

along with the YT, the ooc lets whoever got killed tell the server his side of the story, and the killer to tell his own.
  #102  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:30 PM
Pudge Pudge is offline
Planar Protector

Pudge's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,517
Default

and yea i dont think leaderboard would be good for server

YT=yes

leaderboard=no
  #103  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:31 PM
Doors Doors is offline
Planar Protector

Doors's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,933
Default

Is Nilbog advocating for item loot? It would actually be pretty sweet, like 1 equipped item or something. Bind camping could never be legal then and it would have to be enforced pretty heavily which would get really old really fast. I could go either way item/coin doesn't matter to me.
  #104  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:33 PM
Kope Kope is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 789
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
along with the YT, the ooc lets whoever got killed tell the server his side of the story, and the killer to tell his own.
I'm not exactly sure where stories come into play. It's pvp, you die and get killed, it happens a lot. You're giving people a reason to act like asshats imo.
  #105  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:35 PM
nilbog nilbog is offline
Project Manager

nilbog's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doors [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Is Nilbog advocating for item loot? It would actually be pretty sweet, like 1 equipped item or something. Bind camping could never be legal then and it would have to be enforced pretty heavily which would get really old really fast. I could go either way item/coin doesn't matter to me.
Only personally advocating. Like I said, I'm indifferent to what happens with the loot. I just can't believe the hard core folks... not wanting their precious droppable pixels to be in the hands of another. Surprised me.
  #106  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:38 PM
Aerist Aerist is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Only personally advocating. Like I said, I'm indifferent to what happens with the loot. I just can't believe the hard core folks... not wanting their precious droppable pixels to be in the hands of another. Surprised me.
I think what it comes down to is the understanding that although the "hard core" folks would want item loot, they also understand that in order to pull a higher volume of players it is essential to make sure the bluebies trying out the red server don't have a disincentive to play
  #107  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:39 PM
Misto Misto is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Only personally advocating. Like I said, I'm indifferent to what happens with the loot. I just can't believe the hard core folks... not wanting their precious droppable pixels to be in the hands of another. Surprised me.
Truth.
  #108  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:42 PM
Pudge Pudge is offline
Planar Protector

Pudge's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,517
Default

nilbog we've all played with item loot in and out.. for the health of the server, it should be coin only
  #109  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:43 PM
Misto Misto is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
nilbog we've all played with item loot in and out.. for the health of the server, it should be coin only
pussy
  #110  
Old 08-22-2011, 01:44 PM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

Item loot is retarded.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.