******Official politics thread ******

[Teppler]

The establishment FISA report clears the FBI with 17 "unbiased" random mistakes being made all in Trump's disfavor.

That's a 0.000000762939% chance of actually happening. Essentially 0%. Horowitz report is itself, evidence of a strong FBI bias against Trump.

[feniin]

How'd you get those odds?

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by feniin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How'd you get those odds?

.5^17.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

.5^17.

Quite the assumption to assume mistakes can be equally likely to be assumed as in favour to trump as assumed as in favour against trump.

[Ripp]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The establishment FISA report clears the FBI with 17 "unbiased" random mistakes being made all in Trump's disfavor.

That's a 0.000000762939% chance of actually happening. Essentially 0%. Horowitz report is itself, evidence of a strong FBI bias against Trump.

Yep, it's a crock. There's nothing BUT political bias and corruption all over this sham just like every other sham over the past three years.

This is nothing short of one big coup attempt and they got caught. More and more people are starting to figure this out though, that's why CNN's ratings are tanking.

[feniin]

Anything that paints Trump in an honest light must look like a coup to you.

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quite the assumption to assume mistakes can be equally likely to be assumed as in favour to trump as assumed as in favour against trump.

0 exculpatory evidence was entered in at the same time. Further confirmation that without a doubt this was crooked. Chances of all this happening at the same time without bias is essentially 0.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Teppler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

0 exculpatory evidence was entered in at the same time. Further confirmation that without a doubt this was crooked. Chances of all this happening at the same time without bias is essentially 0.

I'm a little confused about what you're saying here. You're mad the FBI didn't bring claims of commiting innocence?

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm a little confused about what you're saying here. You're mad the FBI didn't bring claims of commiting innocence?

Mad isn’t the right word. It simply further confirms.

They got it wrong and they included

17 mistakes all against trump
0 evidence that pointed to innocence, which he was, added in

Come on. Let’s be realistic here.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Shouldn't it be 50/50?

It either is or it isn't

Assume a mistake is as likely to be pro trump as anti trump. 50/50 or 0.5

Two mistakes is 0.5x0.5 = 0.25 = 0.5^2

Three mistakes is 0.5x0.5x0.5 = 0.125 = 0.5^3

Seventeen is 0.5^17, the number that Trumpler gave.