#1
|
|||
|
Betphoenix Bookkeeping lines
Betphoenix is the PREMIER Bookkeeper of Project1999.
Currently, we are offering PARLAYS, 2+ GAME TEASERS, SPREAD, MONEY LINE, and OVER/UNDER bets. All bets MUST be placed before the event, and with current lines from www.sbrodds.com You may also go to www.betphoenix.com and sign up for a FREE account to calculate your winnings. Currently we are only taking wagers up to 500 platinum. Platinum will be due upon placement of the bet if you do not have any funds currently with Betphoenix. All deposits and payouts will be recorded in an Excel spreadsheet, and accounts funds will be updated the same way. Each transaction will be issued a receipt in the following example: RECEIPT Your wager has been placed with Betphoenix, and your account has been updated. ACCOUNT FUNDS: 1000 platinum WAGER AMOUNT: -200 platinum AVAILABLE FUNDS: 800 platinum You will receive an updated message with the current and updated balance of your account within 24 hours of the event ending. RECEIPT DISCLAIMER: Withdrawal charge of deposited funds will be 200 platinum. | ||
Last edited by Betphoenix; 01-15-2011 at 07:59 PM..
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
Grand opening special! Receive a 15% first deposit bonus up to 2,000 platinum!
Offer only available until January 30th, 2011. | ||
Last edited by Betphoenix; 01-15-2011 at 10:20 PM..
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
Now set up in East Commonlands!
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
I'll take Falcons -3 at halftime, -105. 500p to win 476
__________________
it's like you make the atomic bomb (server) and you don't want to let other countries (guilds) have nuclear secrets (under the radar information). it's gm's business and no one else's or else everyone gets nuked. letting Iran or North Korea beta test and keep the successful nukes, makes other countries uncomfortable. | ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
Thanks Goobles, receipt is in your inbox.
| ||
|
#7
|
|||
|
wow nice idea with the Bookie services! so innovative of you! Oh wait
| ||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Please be respectful and keep slander to yourselves.
Thank you in advance. | ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
I think it's technically libel, not slander.
| ||
|
|
|