Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-01-2019, 10:52 AM
maximum maximum is offline
Planar Protector

maximum's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pink grapefruit [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
With green on the horizon and blue being so very close to this point in the history of EQ, isn't it about time we got halfling rangers and gnome sks?

Here's some interesting info for everyone (including Rogaen):

Pet windows and custom UIs were made available in the July 24, 2002 patch.

Shortie hybrids were made available in the March 19, 2002 patch.

Once this revelation sinks in, it becomes clear that the devs have a moral obligation to give us our tiny hybrids.
I think this is a post about "Classicness" of Blue. Obviously, we don't do Luclin stuff ("no cats on the moon") and we're at November 2001 Era according to the timeline.
__________________

Amax MNK / Amalgamax ROG / maximum
Begging (227)


EQ Map Archive (1,000+ images)
P99 WikiEQ Patch Chronology
  #12  
Old 10-01-2019, 10:55 AM
Canelek Canelek is offline
Fire Giant

Canelek's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 823
Default

It's just shitposting to stir all the new folk up.
  #13  
Old 10-01-2019, 11:19 AM
pink grapefruit pink grapefruit is offline
Planar Protector

pink grapefruit's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,048
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by maximum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think this is a post about "Classicness" of Blue. Obviously, we don't do Luclin stuff ("no cats on the moon") and we're at November 2001 Era according to the timeline.
nope!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canelek [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's just shitposting to stir all the new folk up.
uh, no....

i'm just your average gnome enthusiast! and i'm holding out hope that the devs aren't such hateful sadists that they keep us waiting much longer.... [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #14  
Old 10-01-2019, 11:27 AM
loramin loramin is offline
Planar Protector

loramin's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,340
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maximum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think this is a post about "Classicness" of Blue. Obviously, we don't do Luclin stuff ("no cats on the moon") and we're at November 2001 Era according to the timeline.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pink grapefruit [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
nope!
Actually, I think Maximum hit that nail on the head [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look, everyone knows this place isn't live. You want live stuff, you go to live.

And just about everyone knows that Green is the place you go for only stuff released < 2002. A few people are having a hard time fully "grokking" this, but most get it.

But do Beastlords belong Blue? Do Vah Shir (remade as Kerrans)? Do Halfling Rangers?

Blue's having a sort of "identity crisis" at the moment, because for 10 years it was THE server (let's pretend Red doesn't exist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]). Now it's (about to) not be THE server. But even so ... that identity crisis won't be solved today. It's something Rogean and Nilbog need to decide, and right now they have this little thing called Green occupying their attention.

I suspect once Green is out and the P99 staff is able to take their attention off Green, R&N will let us know how they want to define Blue. And once we know that, we'll know if Halfling Rangers belong on it or not. But we won't know until R&N decide, because it's their box, and like I said they have some other stuff going on right now so I really wouldn't expect a clear Blue definition anytime real soon.
__________________

Loramin Frostseer, Oracle of the Tribunal <Anonymous> and Fan of the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides
Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue server, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of up to 2k+ platinum! Message me for details.
  #15  
Old 10-01-2019, 11:28 AM
Deathrydar Deathrydar is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Actually, I think Maximum hit that nail on the head [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look, everyone knows this place isn't live. You want live stuff, you go to live.

And just about everyone knows that Green is the place you go for only stuff released < 2002. A few people are having a hard time fully "grokking" this, but most get it.

But do Beastlords belong Blue? Do Vah Shir (remade as Kerrans)? Do Halfling Rangers?

Blue's having a sort of "identity crisis" at the moment, because for 10 years it was THE server (let's pretend Red doesn't exist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]). Now it's (about to) not be THE server. But even so ... that identity crisis won't be solved today. It's something Rogean and Nilbog need to decide, and right now they have this little thing called Green occupying their attention.

I suspect once Green is out and the P99 staff is able to take their attention off Green, R&N will let us know how they want to define Blue. And once we know that, we'll know if Halfling Rangers belong on it or not. But we won't know until R&N decide, because it's their box, and like I said they have some other stuff going on right now so I really wouldn't expect a clear Blue definition anytime real soon.
This is what happens when you cater to the whining of a few people that want the project to derail its original vision. Expect more of them to come out of the wood-works and ask/demand non-classic era content now that they see that the devs will back off.
  #16  
Old 10-01-2019, 11:33 AM
pink grapefruit pink grapefruit is offline
Planar Protector

pink grapefruit's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,048
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Actually, I think Maximum hit that nail on the head [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look, everyone knows this place isn't live. You want live stuff, you go to live.

And just about everyone knows that Green is the place you go for only stuff released < 2002. A few people are having a hard time fully "grokking" this, but most get it.

But do Beastlords belong Blue? Do Vah Shir (remade as Kerrans)? Do Halfling Rangers?

Blue's having a sort of "identity crisis" at the moment, because for 10 years it was THE server (let's pretend Red doesn't exist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]). Now it's (about to) not be THE server. But even so ... that identity crisis won't be solved today. It's something Rogean and Nilbog need to decide, and right now they have this little thing called Green occupying their attention.

I suspect once Green is out and the P99 staff is able to take their attention off Green, R&N will let us know how they want to define Blue. And once we know that, we'll know if Halfling Rangers belong on it or not. But we won't know until R&N decide, because it's their box, and like I said they have some other stuff going on right now so I really wouldn't expect a clear Blue definition anytime real soon.
Once green is out they'll be busy with red 2.0 tho...
  #17  
Old 10-01-2019, 11:34 AM
Cen Cen is offline
Planar Protector

Cen's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,233
Default

I'm only okay with gnome shadowknights for some reason. They seem like they make sense. Lol
__________________
  #18  
Old 10-01-2019, 11:41 AM
bigjeff100 bigjeff100 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm only okay with gnome shadowknights for some reason. They seem like they make sense. Lol
For sure.. If a race can choose warrior and necro, there is no reason they shouldn't be allowed the hybrid choice!!!
  #19  
Old 10-01-2019, 11:45 AM
pink grapefruit pink grapefruit is offline
Planar Protector

pink grapefruit's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,048
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm only okay with gnome shadowknights for some reason. They seem like they make sense. Lol
That's bc they've been worshipping Bertoxxulous for so long as both warriors and necros, and Brell makes literally zero sense as a paladin god. Not sure what you got againist halfling rangers and paladins tho.

I'd be okay without the gnome paladins, and with dwarves retroactively losing the ability to be paladins. Dwarves are too stupid to be holy knights, and these characters should be deleted by the devs.
  #20  
Old 10-01-2019, 11:54 AM
Madbad Madbad is offline
Planar Protector

Madbad's Avatar

Join Date: May 2014
Location: Qeynos Hills
Posts: 1,453
Default

Halfing paladin
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.