Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSparkle001
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'd say it has to be willful. There has to be intent to end the pregnancy.
|
My point is, if we accept that the conceived child is a human, full stop, and that killing that human is murder, full stop, doesn't that mean they should be awarded the same kinds of protections as a US citizen would be granted? Accidentally killing someone with your car can result in a manslaughter charge, why not improperly caring for the unborn child in pregnancy?
How do you determine intent? Usually that's done with some kind of investigation, correct? In my opinion, there are issues with enforcement that either infringe upon a persons right to their own body, their own privacy, or do not allow equal protection under the law for the tiniest of humans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reiwa
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What is miscarriage? What happens to the baby and is there malice and intent?
Also why is it a baby now? It was a fetus when it suited your arguments but you got sloppy.
|
Well, as to your second point, I did not once use the word "fetus," and if I wrote "bringing a healthy fetus into this world," that doesn't make sense. I tried to use language which adopted the position that a human's life begins at conception, which is what seems to be a basic tenet of pro life philosophy, no?
By the way, I don't think think anything I posted refutes the claim that a human's life begins at conception, nor am I even arguing that. My point is, if we do adopt the view that 1) a human's life beings at conception and 2) abortion is murder, then we now have lots of issues that come with this that need to be sorted out that I do not believe can be broken down into nice neatly black and white stances like "abortion is murder."