|
View Poll Results: I am Joe Biden's Brain. | |||
Still good. | 19 | 23.75% | |
Barely functional! | 8 | 10.00% | |
Hanging on for dear life!! | 9 | 11.25% | |
Corn Pop was a lying dog faced pony soldier, fat. | 34 | 42.50% | |
Joe Biden was on Flight 77. | 10 | 12.50% | |
Voters: 80. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#121
|
|||
|
| ||
|
#122
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Yes, pilots are raving about it. Quote:
Quote:
Sure they have missiles and stuff. They need operational command and control to use them. They need working radars. Ours will by flying and nearly invulnerable, theirs are going to get turned into piles of rubble one after the other. We have another advantage. We have have three giant unsinkable aircraft carriers parked on their borders; Taiwan, Korea and Japan. The former will be provide a nice soak-off, the latter will provide offensive capability from too many airfields for the Chinese to neutralize. We're building another one here which is conveniently just outside their effective missile range. The Chinese defenses are all static. All those nice South China Sea islands are just sitting ducks. We can pull into range, launch a strike and leave with no repercussions. They should build another dozen targets for us like that. I've read how Van Riper cheated his way to victory, but when I wargame a fight with China I put all the assets I need at extreme range, launch overwhelming strike against target, and move out of range to rearm - because I'm not stuck in a tiny body of water, I have the entire world. After a week of this China has no ground-based radar left and all their 'helicopter' carriers and the rest of their surface navy have become new reefs. I do have some plane attrition and sometimes a carrier is disabled and a couple of frigates sunk to a sub. Oh well. Chinese planes are held together with rice and dogma. Their J-series has trouble finding export market because no one trusts the thing to work right. Worst of all, their pilots have zero operational combat experience. They've never been over a hot zone or lit up for real, and any pilots who could pass that experience on are dead or irrelevant. This is a real problem with their armed forces. They have no experience with anything. They don't take their Navy through the Straits of Hormuz and do real battle drills. They don't fly over Syria and Iraq dodging AA fire and they don't get lit up by Iranian radar. They've never bombed Bosnia, Serbia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen and Somalia. Their tanks only shoot at range targets. Their infantry storms building with cardboard cutouts. They don't fight a war like we do every 10-15 years. Any conflict with China look for India to take what is rightfully theirs, further diluting Chinese power. It must suck to be surrounded by nations which totally hate you. I guess shouldn't act like a giant asshole. And China is asshole. In two decades none of this will matter. Space Force will take care of it. You can't function if your life is inside a giant EMP. | ||||||
|
#123
|
|||
|
SPACE FORCE in action! Assault on China is Asshole Station, 2028 AD.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] https://youtu.be/asgLef3oVAw?t=14 | ||
|
#124
|
||||
|
Quote:
Congrats! | |||
|
#125
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have heard a lot of horror stories from people who are prior service though. Had a friend who was a logistics officer in the army and he was quite sure if we ever got in a shooting war with non-primitives we'd be fucked. Stuff like this among other things. But then, I'm sure the Chinese military is full of people with similar opinions. | |||
|
#126
|
|||
|
What pilots are you asking? Air Force pilots have at times been under orders not to say anything negative about the F-35. They might still be, I haven't checked in a couple years. Marines generally appreciate their version because they're replacing the deathtraps known as Harriers. The Navy has waffled between lukewarm to accepting it because they need aircraft and that's what they're going to get.
At any rate the main problem with the F-35 is that folks want to think of it as a fighter because it's numbered in the fighter series. It's more of a modern equivalent to the F-105, really a bomber first. Nothing with a wing loading as high as that thing has can be called a true air fighter. The cost (both to buy and to maintain/operate) of both it and the F-22 also represent serious problems; they're too expensive to be willing to risk in battle or even to field them in truly sufficient quantities for any length of time. Air power has reached the same point that dreadnought battleship fleets had reached by WW1. That war was not decided by those fleets of steel ships. The next great war will not be decided by high-tech manned single-seaters. They should be very good at conducting bombing missions against second-tier enemies (the kind we usually end up in fights against) who are obtaining increasingly effective air defense weapons. They're expensive for that, too, but maximum survivability matters given a public that has no tolerance for casualties. Danth | ||
|
#127
|
|||
|
| ||
|
#128
|
|||
|
Yep. 5:1. It's my lot in life to be surrounded by beautiful women. Unfortunately, I had a different situation in mind on how that was to go down when I was younger.
| ||
|
#129
|
|||
|
Am i understanding the thread right?
Why is Biden dropping out of a fighterbomber? Is this like when mayor of London, Borris Johnson (now pm) paradropped into the London 2012 Olympic ceremony? | ||
|
#130
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
|