#41
|
|||
|
J eremy bitch tits is correct
| ||
|
#43
|
||||
|
Quote:
"Players are subject to these supplementary rules while playing on Project 1999. While by no means an all-inclusive list of the do's and dont's on Project 1999" Sorry your supplementary, non-all-inclusive rules were supplementary and non-all-inclusive. | |||
|
#44
|
||||
|
Quote:
Perhaps you should test your theory in practice by claiming a camp and refusing to name the next camper. | |||
|
#45
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#46
|
|||
|
HAND SOLO *wack wack*
__________________
Forum Quest
Spyder73 (BANNED) NecroP1999 (BANNED) Frostbane Wolfeye - Green99 - 54 Shaman Cruetraxa Macequest - Green99 - 60 Necromancer Snowleopard Wu'Tong - Green99 - 60 Monk Lobsterhands - Green99 - 55 Cleric #FreeWuTang | ||
|
#47
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#48
|
|||
|
I'd like to hear about even a single example of a GM/Guide saying that is how we operate at any time in the last few years. I certainly won't abide by it unless some server staff explicitly tells me I must. At best I think we could consider such a mandate an optional player-agreed-upon guideline.
Is every trash rule from 2009-2014 under which we used to operate also still valid because some former flunkie made a post about it? I wonder what we could dig up from that period on the forums. Or are previous rules at some point superseded by a new framework of rules, such as we have in May of 2019? Perhaps not all-inclusive, but if the "name next" nonsense was a real rule, I'm pretty sure it would have made it into this document.
__________________
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue | ||
|
#49
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#50
|
||||
|
Quote:
By no means am I a veteran at this game, and this is my first problem wanting to get a camp. So, I thought I would try to get some advice. I'm glad they you would have been able to understand,, and would have been a decent person and allowed us to have the camp. I didn"t understand that I would have to ask the camp holder like a God damn quest NPC for the rights to the camp or they wouldn't understand. I also haven't had any experience with a GM, how would they have handled the situation? In my opinion, I think as Pamela tried to sell the camp. That was the camp holder saying that they were all done, and we should have been able to take the camp from him at the point on. | |||
|
|
|