2020 Election MEGAthread

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because technically the fed shouldnt be making a lot of laws that affedc the lives of people in each state, maybe?

Meaning a lot of environmental law, some states see as totally dumb for their state, and counter productive for their particular climate/region, and many times they are right. This makes them vote against immigration law because there are 2 parties.

Same for the evangelicals.

Basically the problem is, we have a fed that is too powerful for a country, that is too diverse. Maybe?

Im just a dude.

This over 9000% a lot of angry super pacs and environmentalist brigades won't grok this.

The problems this creates are also twofold in that individual people will not hold their local politicians and local businesses accountable instead will rely on "some one else to do it" and the pollution will become outsourced further to places like china or that other place no one gives a shit about like Flynt

See, I'm not really a racist. I do care. I just don't care the way that most people want me to care, which is the way they have been programmed to care and I want to deprogram, reprogram.

I may not be able to write Javascript like GPT3 but I can certainly sperg out like none b3fore, also this is me rambling not about you Jib

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For the sake of argument Id like to offer a contrary opinion on inheritance.

Say there are 2 families, both have kids.

One family decides to spend all their money on vacations, and fancy homes and healthy foods. They watch movies and buy toys for their kids and have a wonderful family unit!

The other family is super strict, and saves all their money, they invest with it, and buy discount everything, their lives are super dry in comparison.

The parents of both children over time pass away.

The kids that had the great childhood see the other kids that have a great adult life because of all the saving and investing their parents did, and are like, "YOOOOO how come you have 2 properties?! I want one, that aint fair! They just GAVE that to you! You didn't earn it"

Idk, think about it. Both families had the same opportunities, they just chose "how to spend their time" and one chose to sacrifice joy now, for security in the future.

You yourself said money is a social fabrication. I agree. Time is the real currency, and it can only be spent or saved to be passed on to your children in the form of currency.

Which means I think it's not fair to say that other's owe you theirs.

The system is holding children accountable for their parents actions, no one deserves two properties, but if people have two properties they shouldn't be stolen away, the children who had dumb parents should have an opportunity to start this cycle for themselves and not be punished because they don't have two properties -- enable children who are smarter than their parents to kill their parents and sieze their parents assets, get back to me.

What we are FUCKING GOD DAMN DOING IS PUNISHING PEOPLE FOR GENERATIONS OF IDIOCY WITHOUT GIVING THEM ANY MEANS TO CHANGE THEIR OWN CIRCUMSTANCES AND SAYING UUUDUMMMBB U DUMMMB

Rather than killing off these failed GATTACAs and giving them some peace in a merciful way we perpetuate the system so we can then have 1000 properties. Or more. And now we have a virtual form of slavery where there are untouchables walking among us who are nearly immortal and need to get checked by some people in walmart gear (pvp reference)

poeople then resort to violence and lawlessness and tearing at the system and become decensitized to such things then desire only the blood of those who aren't in fucking purgatory.

alll mostly because a subset of our population cannot get their hands dirty with hard labor or real productivity.

----- I'm familiar with getting shit on then immediatly joining the military to escape, wanting to kill virtually every moving animate thing infront of me, and surviving, that kinda colors my worldview, but it's real nature baked it into us and if we force people to that place it will destroy us. All.

Most people don't have the genetic or mental ability to succesfully navigate this hell. We were designed innitially for tribal communal behavior, were individuals didn't hold nearly the same power as we can now. But that primal fear instinct I'm talking about is baked into us, that reptilian. Is there waiting to be hatched from its egg in the deep resessces of our bodies and it will drive our spirits insane. I think certain subsets of people are way more disposed to this. Based on lived experience and the amount of antipsychotics I use to stay out of prison. or not self harm

my best advice to people feeling outrage from reading this - take them pills and stop worrying about the people with 2 or 1000 properties it will fucking destroy you, you can't even imagine the people who start numbering in the hundres of thousands or millions or billions or trillions. You won't be able to until you start approaching that threshold, if thats what you want

find something uplifting and uplift yourself even if it's just carving little chunks of wood into sawdust (or whatever) if thats all you can do, get into it and learn to feel through your body and let your numbed mind rest, let yourself float in the ocean and just let the waves wash over you... lay out all night and watch the stars on drugs whatever. pour a bath of freezing water and try not to die from hypothermia.. whatever.

its not all bad.

project1999 is enabled by this system, and xbox's are ubiquitus, and there's nothing stopping us from fasting and walking for health.

and we are reaching a point where the rich can and will solve this problem, they might kill us all tho ) probably not allll of us

no one likes seeing streets lined with the dead bumbs of plague victims it's unnatrractive, once it gets to that point society can adapt, relying on the rich to solve the problem(s) is spiritually corrupt and harmful to our selves however. So is attacking them simply for being rich. If you're going to go after someone go after their character and actions. Or try to not go after people and just learn to accept them for who and what they are and communicate in a tolerant way that will make sense, if not well. You will look like this post.

If you have the opportunity to talk to people much higher up the rung then you, if you get pissy they are likely to shut you down in defense of themselves. As nature intends. Cherish that opportunity, even if it is just to learn from observation.

[imperiouskitten]

*tokes puff* im vibin this

[cd288]

Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah I just want any possible impropriety investigated thoroughly, so there's no question that biden won fair and square. Biden should invite this, if only to shut up the trump campaign claiming some kind of fraud. If fraud occured I want to know, and if it didn't occur I want to know. I don't think that it did, because republicans seem to have retained the senate and gained house seats. I'll happily accept that Biden won fairly cause I like my country and I believe in the systems we use, I only hope that democrats won't try to change them given an opportunity.

And again if the dems had fielded a better candidate I probably would have voted for them over trump anyway. I'd take a president Tulsi, she's a robo babe.

I get what you’re saying but there’s no real need to “invite” it. If there was actual a evidence of fraud or impropriety they would be suing the hell out of whatever state based on it and the GOP would be funding a legit legal team. The fact that they are not doing this (contrast with Bush v Gore for example when they funded a Bush legal team with 3 people who are now on SCOTUS) should speak volumes about how totally baseless these made up fraud claims are.

Total shocker...the guy who said it would be fraudulent when he was losing in the polls months ago before any votes were even counted is now claiming fraud. What a fucking joke. Can’t wait for the Republican Party to put forth a candidate I can actually vote for in 2024.

[White_knight]

Can we just swear the old geriatric in already so all the people who voted for him will realise that he's just more of the same ol' same.

[magnetaress]

I woke up from a dream of some nerd using their vectored thrust to melt my fucking dashboard while on a drive to no where. Unintentially, probably. Basically the entire dash and electrical system started heat warp to vaporize. There's more to this dream. But it's hard to explain.

If you wonderin why I am jammin my keyboard at 3:15 am.

[Viscere]

Drumpf has lost

Do you think they will escort him outta the white house ?

[Jibartik]

I watched 3 Illuminati movies tonight

[Mota]

Originally Posted by HalflingSpergand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Abolish the fed

And use what, gold coins? Let congress do monetary policy? Fucken lol.

[HalflingSpergand]

Meant federal government but while we are abolishing let's do the federal reserve too. Gold coins, chickens, cows, guns, hard work stuff like that is fine

[Mota]

Originally Posted by Danth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Helps prevent tyranny by the majority and ensures the government has to pay at least *some* attention to more than just the coastal megalopolis cities.

AKA democracy. It's not perfect but it's pros outweigh the cons. Tyranny of majority is a pretty lame argument for the EC usefulness when a con of the EC is legitimized minority rule.

Instead of paying attention to the majority of voters, they pay attention to swing states, and the ever important Iowa primary. Whoopty fucken doo? Why are ever shifting swing states and Iowa the place to be? Why do they get so much weight in deciding elections while states with tens of millions of people, like Cali or Texas, are basically ignored.

EC is a relic of a former era. Over half of states nullify faithless elector votes, castrating the EC's original intent and power. When a majority of states have already decided not to let the EC circumvent votes, why does it exist? Just kill it already.