Supreme Court Shuts Down Fake GOP Claims

[Gravydoo II]

You cant be accepted as an actual case if you have no standing. The courts in texas have no standing in any of the states they are suing. You only have standing in your own jurisdiction. Thats it.

Look at what standing means.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/standing

This is an attempt at begging for a pardon from the AG to trump because hes under some serious investigations for bribery and abuse of power concerning a wealthy real estate donor. He wants the roger stone treatment, so hes putting on this shit show for trumps fragile ass ego.

Did anyone on the right take criminal justice I in 9th grade...???

[Cassawary]

Originally Posted by FatherSioux [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So the people against these suits are against securing our elections. They genuinely believe the only motivation here is for a Trump victory. This showcases once again how the left has a shallow moral foundation.

That is your opinion and it is very stupid. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Thulian]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I cant wait til they move to phase 2, insurgency and terrorism. They will show their true colors in a few weeks. The christians, party of god, party of logic, facts over feelings, are gonna get the big mad and go on mass shooting sprees.

Ben Shapiro is going to lead a batallion with steven crowder as his second in command. They will conquer a starbucks to stick it to the libs.

The proud boys battalion will march until their feet hurt and then go home.

dont say shit like this

[cd288]

Originally Posted by FatherSioux [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So the people against these suits are against securing our elections. They genuinely believe the only motivation here is for a Trump victory. This showcases once again how the left has a shallow moral foundation.

No one is against securing the elections. There has been no actual evidence that the elections were not secure. Trumps own head of cyber security said this was the most secure election in history. His own AG (who up until now has been a completely loyal puppet) said there is no evidence of fraud. When pressed in court to say whether there had been fraud, all the lawyers representing the people alleging fraud have told the judges that there was no fraud. The election was secure and there isn’t evidence otherwise.

If there was actual evidence, then the courts wouldn’t be shutting down the suits. Many of the judges who have shut the frivolous lawsuits down are Trump appointees btw. He lost. It’s over. And the more you extreme right people whine and make stuff up just because you’re such babies that you can’t handle an election loss, you make people like myself embarrassed to say we’re a Republican.

[BarnabusCollins]

Libertarian. Hate both parties. Hate snowflakes, hate rednecks. Damn that bout covers all America.

[douglas1999]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There has been no actual evidence that the elections were not secure. Trumps own head of cyber security said this was the most secure election in history.

Haha what? There has been a ton of evidence. That powell chick who is kind of nuts keeps getting conflated with the sworn testimony of the actual people who were actually administrating these elections, both state and local. "No actual evidence" pretty much translates to "No evidence that I approve of.". It's a pure no true scotsman to say that.

"There's a bunch of evidence, but there's no actual evidence, you see. So case closed. I guess all the elected officials who are staking huge amounts of money and their reputations on simply wanting these things to be investigated aren't as smart as me."

[imperiouskitten]

haha now he's bashing powell too

TV brain

[BarnabusCollins]

The Illuminati will turn on you millennial snowflakes.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Haha what? There has been a ton of evidence. That powell chick who is kind of nuts keeps getting conflated with the sworn testimony of the actual people who were actually administrating these elections, both state and local. "No actual evidence" pretty much translates to "No evidence that I approve of.". It's a pure no true scotsman to say that.

"There's a bunch of evidence, but there's no actual evidence, you see. So case closed. I guess all the elected officials who are staking huge amounts of money and their reputations on simply wanting these things to be investigated aren't as smart as me."

Literally the only evidence has been random people making unsubstantiated hearsay statements. Remember the woman who said she was given a sticky note by a poll worker that said there was fraud going on? Lol

Move on man. It’s embarrassing and pathetic at this point. Losses happen; as an adult your supposed to accept things and deal with it and move on, not whine like a 5 year old.

[Cassawary]

Originally Posted by imperiouskitten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

haha now he's bashing powell too

TV brain

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Move on man. It’s embarrassing and pathetic at this point. Losses happen; as an adult your supposed to accept things and deal with it and move on, not whine like a 5 year old.