|
View Poll Results: For or Against this proposal? | |||
Yes, I like it. | 23 | 32.86% | |
Needs some work | 11 | 15.71% | |
No, I don't like it. | 36 | 51.43% | |
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
You guys do realize that it doesn't say anywhere in the proposal what you can or can't do with your ring once you have completed the quest right? You would still be able to MQ your ring if you wanted to...
| ||
|
#12
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Judeauu - 60 rogue
Grriffith - 60 warrior Ahealer - 60 cleric Ielwenu - 56 magician Deeloofie - 49 monk | |||
|
#13
|
||||
|
Quote:
The proposed agreement looks pretty reasonable for the intent, but a support staff rep does need to sign off on it too or else it's kind of pointless. Again, the current agreement works for all parties (aside from being collectively a monstrous waste of time), but the proposed agreement will just be a high-turnout shitshow if there are no repercussions for breaking the terms.
__________________
[60 Druid] Jomar (Halfling) <The Black Hand>
[60 Wizard] Astizen (Erudite) <The Black Hand> | |||
|
#14
|
||||
|
Quote:
This isn't a debate on your wild imaginations. If you can't contribute anything positive towards this conversation, then just continue posting in RNF and leave this conversation to the adults. For everyone else, I appreciate your input. | |||
|
#15
|
||||
|
Quote:
@Everyone - Keep Voting! | |||
|
#16
|
|||
|
lol @ this con artist
bought and sold his ring MQ and is getting angry that he can't get angry now nobody should get angry because he's angry | ||
|
#17
|
|||
|
@Samoht
I see you do not possess the capability, composure, nor maturity to contribute to this topic and will no longer engage you to feed your ego. Have a nice day. | ||
|
#18
|
|||
|
biggest issue with this setup will be tracking the time of death. I think the variable spawn makes it hard to have a roll on window opening. One person fails to update the time of death, and then no one but that person knows the actual window for the next one. How will you deal with people showing up after the roll has taken place claiming to be on time for the window opening?
| ||
|
#19
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#20
|
||||
|
Quote:
The only viable solution that provides both a log and accountability would be utilizing the Discord p99 Blue-General channel. First, anyone can update the winning roll player characters' name and there will be a timestamp, thus providing a clear and measurable "window" of the mob. Since the winning player's name would be logged, there would be a record to hold accountable that player if they chose not to update the ToD. Punishment for not updating the ToD by a player would be left up to the discretion of the CSR/GM's. This scenario self polices everyone involved. There will most certainly be other players spot checking or even camping the entire window in the hopes of sniping after the 1 hour spawn / fail to engage timer has started. Keep in mind the goal of this proposal is two-fold: 1) Eliminate the combined hundreds of wasted hours by moving the winner of the roll to the beginning of the window instead of a sockfest. 2) Eliminate / Mitigate the ability of those that seek to corrupt this particular portion of the quest in an attempt to profit for profits' sake. This proposal does not have anything to do with the Ring once you obtain it and you are free to do whatever you like with your Ring. | |||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|