Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #371  
Old 02-08-2022, 04:16 PM
titanshub titanshub is offline
Sarnak

titanshub's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 289
Default

[QUOTE=xdrcfrx;3421029]I'm explicitly stating that these are two different questions raised by the OP's video, and have repeatedly said that the questions about Stunningly the individual are not especially meaningful as compared to the questions about cheating in races, generally. I don't really care, ultimately, if Stunningly is scripting his race starts or not (although, as stated, i find the evidence in favor of him doing that to be persuasive). I'm more concerned about how we can have any faith in footraces as a fair metric for competing for FTE now. We can't, because as Kickenit and Joria have shown, it is very easy to cheat. Nobody is questioning that it's possible to cheat - in other words, you agree that cheating at footraces is both possible and very easy to do?

[QUOTE=Samoht;3421020]I have yet to see anybody from Riot proposing changes to foot races in the proper channels, and if they did so, they would promptly be shot down (and rightfully so) based on Riot's own former precedent.[/QUOTE=Samoht]

OP stated he sent this all to the GM's months ago. What other channels would be "proper" in your view, and had this been raised in those channels would your opinion change? This feels like a meaningless deflection. Why should "Riot's own former precedent" determine whether or not the GM's change the ruleset?

[QUOTE=Samoht;3421020]My guess is that you see the cheating angle as a way to automatically get the changes you want. It's too bad the GMs saw right through your scam.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht

More strawmanning and and personal attacks. You acknowledge above that cheating is possible, so what is the scam exactly? Why can't you just engage with this subject honestly? (that's a rhetorical question, I understand why you won't).



ok?
Lockouts and foot races make the cheating even more problematic. It would then effect every raid encounter instead of a few.
__________________
Sincerely,
His Lizardliness, Spacepope the first. - 60 Leezard Grandmaster
~ Proud Former Leader of <Kittens Who Say Meow> ~
  #372  
Old 02-08-2022, 04:24 PM
Darmai Darmai is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Profyx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Maybe you should research Audio Reaction time vs Visual reaction time. You realize your sense take different pathways to the brain?
https://new.cognitivefun.net/task/co...-reaction-time

Give this test a shot please =)
  #373  
Old 02-08-2022, 04:26 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xdrcfrx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
OP stated he sent this all to the GM's months ago. What other channels would be "proper" in your view, and had this been raised in those channels would your opinion change? This feels like a meaningless deflection. Why should "Riot's own former precedent" determine whether or not the GM's change the ruleset?
You propose changes in the UN, not by begging GMs to validate your baseless claims that Stunningly is cheating. Arcler's former behavior will mean any changes proposed will be turned down. You reap what you sow, oh well.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/a...1&d=1644341706

Precedent here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xdrcfrx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
More strawmanning and and personal attacks. You acknowledge above that cheating is possible, so what is the scam exactly? Why can't you just engage with this subject honestly? (that's a rhetorical question, I understand why you won't).
I have engaged in this honestly. You're lying yourself if you pretend that you haven't crossed any of the lines that you accuse me of crossing. The only difference is you don't see me crying about it. If it hurts your feelings to hear that somebody thinks you're crying, maybe you should consider not crying?
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #374  
Old 02-08-2022, 04:27 PM
xdrcfrx xdrcfrx is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 228
Default

ugh, i'm not sure where I derped the formatting, but that last post is all over the place. /shrug lol.
  #375  
Old 02-08-2022, 04:29 PM
Ringi Ringi is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You propose changes in the UN, not by begging GMs to validate your baseless claims that Stunningly is cheating. Arcler's former behavior will mean any changes proposed will be turned down. You reap what you sow, oh well.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/a...1&d=1644341706

Precedent here.



I have engaged in this honestly. You're lying yourself if you pretend that you haven't crossed any of the lines that you accuse me of crossing. The only difference is you don't see me crying about it. If it hurts your feelings to hear that somebody thinks you're crying, maybe you should consider not crying?
You must be insufferable to be around in real life.
  #376  
Old 02-08-2022, 04:34 PM
xdrcfrx xdrcfrx is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 228
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You propose changes in the UN, not by begging GMs to validate your baseless claims that Stunningly is cheating. Arcler's former behavior will mean any changes proposed will be turned down. You reap what you sow, oh well.

Interesting to hear you tout the UN - i suppose if 6 out of 7 guilds in the UN were in favor of doing away with foot races, you'd find that proper and go right along with it? This is just more goalpost moving in any event, because you're trying to change the subject of the conversation from the substance of the critique (that cheating is possible, and very easy to do), to the place where the critique was raised.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have engaged in this honestly. You're lying yourself if you pretend that you haven't crossed any of the lines that you accuse me of crossing. The only difference is you don't see me crying about it. If it hurts your feelings to hear that somebody thinks you're crying, maybe you should consider not crying?
You haven't, because you're still lobbing personal attacks ("you're crying! wahhhhh") instead of addressing the actual merits of the discussion. You haven't actually even bothered to try answering the question - why should we have any faith in footraces as a fair means of competition, in light of how easily they are cheated?
  #377  
Old 02-08-2022, 04:36 PM
Bardp1999 Bardp1999 is offline
Planar Protector

Bardp1999's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Maceland
Posts: 1,412
Default

All Raiders must have electrodes hooked up to their genitals and nipples while in a P99 raid zone - any losing raid force will be shocked as punishment for losing, any winning raid force will be shocked for being no life losers. All pixels will be classified as "NO LOOT" and will decay with the corpse they drop from.
__________________
Forum Quest
Spyder73 (BANNED)
NecroP1999 (BANNED)
Frostbane Wolfeye - Green99 - 54 Shaman
Cruetraxa Macequest - Green99 - 60 Necromancer
Snowleopard Wu'Tong - Green99 - 60 Monk
Lobsterhands - Green99 - 55 Cleric
#FreeWuTang
  #378  
Old 02-08-2022, 04:40 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xdrcfrx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Interesting to hear you tout the UN - i suppose if 6 out of 7 guilds in the UN were in favor of doing away with foot races, you'd find that proper and go right along with it? This is just more goalpost moving in any event, because you're trying to change the subject of the conversation from the substance of the critique (that cheating is possible, and very easy to do), to the place where the critique was raised.
Yes, please post in UN admitting that Riot proved it was possible to cheat by cheating themselves and ask for suggestions on how to handle Riot's cheating.

Quote:
Originally Posted by xdrcfrx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You haven't, because you're still lobbing personal attacks ("you're crying! wahhhhh") instead of addressing the actual merits of the discussion. You haven't actually even bothered to try answering the question - why should we have any faith in footraces as a fair means of competition, in light of how easily they are cheated?
That's not what this thread is about. You're moving the goalposts, and I don't really care about your new topic.
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #379  
Old 02-08-2022, 04:41 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes, please post in UN admitting that Riot proved it was possible to cheat by cheating themselves and ask for suggestions on how to handle Riot's cheating.
To continue with this, I would recommend leaving OPs video where they try to defame Stunningly out of it as it adds nothing to THAT conversation specifically.
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #380  
Old 02-08-2022, 04:42 PM
Ringi Ringi is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yes, please post in UN admitting that Riot proved it was possible to cheat by cheating themselves and ask for suggestions on how to handle Riot's cheating.



That's not what this thread is about. You're moving the goalposts, and I don't really care about your new topic.
Oh well then everyone, Samoht doesn't care, so we're all done here. Let's move on.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.