Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: For or Against this proposal?
Yes, I like it. 23 32.86%
Needs some work 11 15.71%
No, I don't like it. 36 51.43%
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-22-2021, 01:26 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SantagarBrax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
2) Eliminate / Mitigate the ability of those that seek to corrupt this particular portion of the quest in an attempt to profit for profits' sake.
You yourself are proven to be guilty of this by your own words. The hypocrisy here is astounding.
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #22  
Old 06-22-2021, 01:27 PM
SantagarBrax SantagarBrax is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 389
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SantagarBrax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The only viable solution that provides both a log and accountability would be utilizing the Discord p99 Blue-General channel.
Or....a newly created channel named "An Angry Goblin - Winners" in Discord p99.
  #23  
Old 06-22-2021, 03:23 PM
Jontheripper Jontheripper is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 101
Default

2 negative options, one positive option = absolute garbage poll and cannot be used for anything except on how not to create a poll.
  #24  
Old 06-22-2021, 06:30 PM
Synphul Synphul is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 80
Default

I'm going to go ahead and file this under 'nah' like it looks most others have done. Staff requiring regular players to use Discord or log into an external website to camp a mob is terribly un-classic and just dumb. A lot of people don't use and/or won't use Discord, so they aren't allowed to camp it? Forcing that requirement onto your average player is a terrible idea and shows you're really only doing this for yourself because that's what works for you. Any agreement should be simple and require the least amount of work outside of actually camping and rolling for the mob as possible, and what we have now is a lot closer to that than what is being proposed in this thread. Telling someone they can't camp Angry because they don't have or use Discord, again, is just dumb and your rules just complicate the entire process.

If you're in a raid guild then you can most likely already get the timer. If you're not then it isn't really hard to get if you're not completely socially inept. Poopsocking a spawn is P99 at it's core and it's fair based on the original game design that some items take extraordinary effort to obtain. It already requires minimal effort to participate. You literally just have to be there and be able to /rand.

The existing rules level the playing field and works for all parties without needing excessive oversight or rules.

It sounds like your real beef is just with the variance. You might have more luck mounting a campaign to keep the rules the same and remove the variance. But expect to /rand against a LOT more people if they remove the variance.
  #25  
Old 06-22-2021, 11:25 PM
SantagarBrax SantagarBrax is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 389
Default

Those of you that advocate for changing code within this game (variance) for the benefit of the player base simply do not understand that the dev's are not going to do that. They only do that to benefit them and their staff. (Raid scene issues/less petitions)

So forget about it already.
  #26  
Old 06-22-2021, 11:33 PM
SantagarBrax SantagarBrax is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 389
Default

For all these naysayers and "Needs Work" / "No, I don't like it" votes...I'm still waiting on any intelligent amendments to improve the proposal.

As far as requiring an "outside source" to update, it's already done on the Wiki for Ring 8. You're willing to sit through 7hrs and 15 mins variance every few days but object to spending 30 seconds to update the ToD in Discord? I find this impossible to believe.
  #27  
Old 06-22-2021, 11:48 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SantagarBrax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
For all these naysayers and "Needs Work" / "No, I don't like it" votes...I'm still waiting on any intelligent amendments to improve the proposal.
Why are you insisting on one angry per character when you yourself BOUGHT and SOLD a ring MQ?
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #28  
Old 06-24-2021, 06:00 AM
Pootle Pootle is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: London
Posts: 208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why are you insisting on one angry per character when you yourself BOUGHT and SOLD a ring MQ?
Good question. Lets have an answer to this....
  #29  
Old 06-24-2021, 08:59 AM
myrddraal myrddraal is offline
Kobold

myrddraal's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 126
Default

the agreement as it is works just fine, convoluting the system and adding all sorts of extra rules is unnecessary. Should we roll for stormfeather and lodizal too? For cash camps? An alternate solution to your "i cant win this roll" problem is try to buy everyone out. The fact of the matter is you dont even NEED this ring to get your SWC, many guilds have a regal band they pass around for a nominal fee so everyone can skip that part entirely as long as they pass it along. Adding more rules to something that already works is DUMB.
__________________
Judeauu - 60 rogue
Grriffith - 60 warrior
Ahealer - 60 cleric
Ielwenu - 56 magician
Deeloofie - 49 monk
  #30  
Old 06-24-2021, 11:12 AM
Dennar Dennar is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 84
Default

Ill throw you a bone and provide a suggestion to one of the problems you have, but is also nearly as bad.

Instead of rolling at the opening of the window, which has a ton of problems that can lead to complications, roll at the end of the window. At the end of the window, Angry will be up and the turn in can be completed at that time and everyone can still stay and kill Skargus. This solves multiple issues with your suggestions, but creates its own list of problems that nearly everyone will hate.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.