Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 12-26-2022, 08:50 PM
Botten Botten is offline
Planar Protector

Botten's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,978
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Nuclear energy is insanely cleaner than any other proposed energy source, and by far provides more kwh per human death associated with it's production, for a fraction of the land footprint of both fossil fuels and hippy windmills.

Still no good argument from dems like AOC against nuclear. They either pretend it doesn't exist, or pretend nuclear = scary atomic bombs cause they are 7th graders in politician's clothing.
Man you keep pumping out the examples of how ignorant you really are.

Around 12.1 trillion yen ($82 billion) has already been spent to deal with the 2011 disaster at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, according to sources at the Board of Audit of Japan.

The utility now aims to start that work in the second half of fiscal 2023. It is still on going....


Scientifically speaking contamination with radioactive caesium, with a half-life of up to around 30 years, remains in the environment for a long time.

And lets talk about Chernobyl

Experts have said it will be at least 3,000 years for the area to become safe, while others believe this is too optimistic. It is thought that the reactor site will not become habitable again for at least 20,000 years, according to a 2016 report.

roughly US $68 billion in 2019, adjusted for inflation.


How about the worse body of water most contaminated with radioactive pollution: Lake Karachay (aka "Reservoir 9"), a small lake formerly located near the Mayak Production Association, a nuclear facility in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia.

standing near the shore you'd be exposed to a dose of 5.6 Sievert per hour. That's enough radiation to kill you in about 50 minutes.


But sure have a cow about ... what did you call them.. hippy wind mills. What if we coupled it with solar energy... still too hippy for you?

Wind and solar produce more electricity than nuclear for the first time in the US and much safer

Keep sticking that foot in your mouth Baler.

Got to love your Ben Shapiro on the spot made up statistics and opinions!!!
__________________
Last edited by Botten; 12-26-2022 at 08:54 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 12-26-2022, 09:59 PM
Reiwa Reiwa is offline
Planar Protector

Reiwa's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 7,010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Man you keep pumping out the examples of how ignorant you really are.

Around 12.1 trillion yen ($82 billion) has already been spent to deal with the 2011 disaster at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant, according to sources at the Board of Audit of Japan.

The utility now aims to start that work in the second half of fiscal 2023. It is still on going....


Scientifically speaking contamination with radioactive caesium, with a half-life of up to around 30 years, remains in the environment for a long time.

And lets talk about Chernobyl

Experts have said it will be at least 3,000 years for the area to become safe, while others believe this is too optimistic. It is thought that the reactor site will not become habitable again for at least 20,000 years, according to a 2016 report.

roughly US $68 billion in 2019, adjusted for inflation.


How about the worse body of water most contaminated with radioactive pollution: Lake Karachay (aka "Reservoir 9"), a small lake formerly located near the Mayak Production Association, a nuclear facility in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russia.

standing near the shore you'd be exposed to a dose of 5.6 Sievert per hour. That's enough radiation to kill you in about 50 minutes.


But sure have a cow about ... what did you call them.. hippy wind mills. What if we coupled it with solar energy... still too hippy for you?

Wind and solar produce more electricity than nuclear for the first time in the US and much safer

Keep sticking that foot in your mouth Baler.

Got to love your Ben Shapiro on the spot made up statistics and opinions!!!
I forget if it's kwh/cost or mhw/cost for the words but do those for the nuke-u-lar and the wind and the solar.

Deuterium can be mined from the sea.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Encroaching Death View Post
Covid is real
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 12-27-2022, 06:42 AM
Encroaching Death Encroaching Death is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2022
Posts: 5,720
Default

Here's why Dems don't like Nuclear:
  1. They would have to agree with Republicans on something.
  2. It would solve the energy issue, and therefore take away one of their talking points.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 12-27-2022, 08:43 AM
Botten Botten is offline
Planar Protector

Botten's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,978
Default

R2topic fun

https://youtu.be/Z3oA4tK_dsY
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 12-27-2022, 10:23 AM
magnetaress magnetaress is offline
Planar Protector

magnetaress's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Inside of you.
Posts: 8,700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Encroaching Death [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Here's why Dems don't like Nuclear:
  1. They would have to agree with Republicans on something.
  2. It would solve the energy issue, and therefore take away one of their talking points.
I agree lol. Plus less money for rich ppl. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 12-27-2022, 11:25 AM
Botten Botten is offline
Planar Protector

Botten's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,978
Default

Right?!11?!

Why the U.S. government plans to spend billions to keep money-losing nuclear plants open
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 12-27-2022, 11:33 AM
magnetaress magnetaress is offline
Planar Protector

magnetaress's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Inside of you.
Posts: 8,700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They lose money for political reasons. Thanks bureaucrats and lobbies. Also when u do stuff like force ppl to use a government CONTRACTED lab for radiometer screening. It's pretty yikes.

It would be the cheapest. Cleanest. And safest. Without democrats or Republicans in charge.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 12-27-2022, 11:35 AM
Encroaching Death Encroaching Death is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2022
Posts: 5,720
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah, Nuclear is having a tough time competing with the low prices of natural gas.

But it's the best option for clean, renewable energy.

It's MUCH worse for Wind and Solar.

From your article:

"More problematically, wind and solar are intermittent sources of energy ó the sun isnít always shining, and the wind isnít always blowing. They canít replace nuclear (or gas or coal) as baseload sources until utility-scale battery technology is developed and built out. Thatís still years away."

Aren't you types all for banning oil?

If so, Nuclear is your only legit option.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 12-27-2022, 11:37 AM
magnetaress magnetaress is offline
Planar Protector

magnetaress's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Inside of you.
Posts: 8,700
Default

Atlantis 2.0 will rise after the collapse of government. And only then. Then we'll blow a hole in half of a continent again lol.

Hopefully someone does a remotebackup of the data.


We should build two Atlantii maybe do one on earth. One on mars. One in lagrange. One on Titan.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 12-27-2022, 11:37 AM
Encroaching Death Encroaching Death is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2022
Posts: 5,720
Default

my body is ready
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.