#721
|
||||
|
Quote:
Mental health is the only decent suggestion but I'm skeptical even that would ever yield legislation, much less legislation that passes both chambers and gets signed and is effective All of this to avoid the elephant in the room that we call "gun control" | |||
#722
|
||||
|
Quote:
25 is the meanest shit. | |||
#723
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Loramin Frostseer, Oracle of the Tribunal <Anonymous> and Fan of the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue server, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of up to 2k+ platinum! Message me for details. | ||||
#724
|
|||
|
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deceitful
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/statism
__________________
| ||
#725
|
||||
|
Quote:
So you must mean semi-automatic. So if we take that technology away, we go back to single action revolvers like in the Wild West days? Or go further back to powder loading muskets? It helps to know about guns in and out before deciding which are the most dangerous and why. I certainly don’t so I won’t try | |||
#726
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
#729
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
#730
|
|||
|
So if we go back to Wild West revolvers, I’ve seen some cowboy movies where a cowboy “fans” the back of the gun’s lever with his other hand to shoot rapidly, making it seem almost as fast as a semi-automatic
Would that be cool or should we ban that? No gun fanning? Or is the decrease in potential accuracy a decent trade off? | ||
|
|