Why 2-boxing results in a permaban

[Onry]

Nevermind just found the sticky on this subject

[Gel Mibson]

one player per client.

[Danne]

Originally Posted by Amelinda [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This was originally posted by Rutaq. I think this post is AMAZING.

For me, it's not about a matter of people CHEATING or not. Sure, it's against the rules which might be considered "cheating" and it screws up the economy. That I don't care about. What annoys me though with boxers is the lack of player control behind every character. It turns the game into that soul-less mercenary-based game that EQlive (and EQ2!!!) has become where people box-solo.

[p-niner]

Just legalize it if it cant be properly monitored. No harm comes from it. Just bigger pop numbers which attracts new comers anyway.

[Swish]

Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just legalize it if it cant be properly monitored. No harm comes from it. Just bigger pop numbers which attracts new comers anyway.

As many will leave as turn up if you legalize it, you'll just have the sham Sleeper server but on P99 red. I'd sooner see a clean wipe of the server to attract blue players across... they've been screaming for a new server for years.

[p-niner]

They had a chance for new box when red released not sure why u mentioned that. Why woukd people leave if boxing was enabled?

[jcmtg]

Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They had a chance for new box when red released not sure why u mentioned that. Why woukd people leave if boxing was enabled?

My guess is that people would leave if 2-boxing was enabled because they wouldn't want to have to compete with the 2-boxers to gain any lost advantages

[big mouth chew]

bump

[pharmakos]

lol

[hagard]

fuck amelinda and her rules