Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #641  
Old 10-15-2017, 06:18 PM
Rivera Rivera is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 317
Default

Yeah I remember a 300-400 pop in 2014 sometime. A shame how the minority population ran everyone out. The losers that think griefing 24/7 is the way to play EQ PVP.

As someone who is an RZ native it killed me to see the spike in pop. They let the basement dwellers win.

PVP in the game isn't polished or even that good, but if the community was even remotely civil, it's a better ruleset than the pissing and hollering match on blue. Just in my opinion.

Not to say the Blue community is better, and in many ways it's much much worse.
  #642  
Old 10-15-2017, 06:30 PM
Dreenk317 Dreenk317 is offline
Fire Giant

Dreenk317's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivera [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah I remember a 300-400 pop in 2014 sometime. A shame how the minority population ran everyone out. The losers that think griefing 24/7 is the way to play EQ PVP.

As someone who is an RZ native it killed me to see the spike in pop. They let the basement dwellers win.

PVP in the game isn't polished or even that good, but if the community was even remotely civil, it's a better ruleset than the pissing and hollering match on blue. Just in my opinion.

Not to say the Blue community is better, and in many ways it's much much worse.
Make (teams) pvp great again
  #643  
Old 10-15-2017, 06:49 PM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,958
Default

the ironhand of tmo did not allow rule lawyering about lodizal

return to monarchs!
  #644  
Old 10-16-2017, 12:22 AM
Dreenk317 Dreenk317 is offline
Fire Giant

Dreenk317's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
the ironhand of tmo did not allow rule lawyering about lodizal

return to monarchs!
Ya they did:
"TMO guy: I'll sell you my Lodi FTE for 10$ U.S.
Random guy: isn't that against the rules?
TMO guy: nah, I'm a lawyer, don't worry about it."
  #645  
Old 10-16-2017, 12:32 AM
wwoneo wwoneo is offline
Fire Giant

wwoneo's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 996
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreenk317 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ya they did:
"TMO guy: I'll sell you my Lodi FTE for 10$ U.S.
Random guy: isn't that against the rules?
TMO guy: nah, I'm a lawyer, don't worry about it."
How did you get my logs? Damn TMO guy passed the P99 Bar!
  #646  
Old 10-16-2017, 11:09 AM
sereal sereal is offline
Scrawny Gnoll

sereal's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivera [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The only thing I remember about TMO is the ridiculous ass rape they received on Red. I've never been more ashamed.
It was a brief period and a good while ago (before velious ) but I remember at the time TMO was dominating blue? There was another guild who I forget the name of too. The bit about red doesn't surprise me. PVE is very different that PVP.

I feel a little bad for TMO, all those pixels and no one to tell their story. I was hoping for a epic tale of salt and tears.
  #647  
Old 10-16-2017, 11:45 AM
HippoNipple HippoNipple is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivera [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah I remember a 300-400 pop in 2014 sometime. A shame how the minority population ran everyone out. The losers that think griefing 24/7 is the way to play EQ PVP.

As someone who is an RZ native it killed me to see the spike in pop. They let the basement dwellers win.

PVP in the game isn't polished or even that good, but if the community was even remotely civil, it's a better ruleset than the pissing and hollering match on blue. Just in my opinion.

Not to say the Blue community is better, and in many ways it's much much worse.
It is 100% on the Devs to create a server that keeps a high population, not the community. Red started with bugs, cheats and soon made server rules that made the raid scene all about zerging.

You can't expect a community to go against the natural rules of the server to create an environment that is favorable for everyone. The server rules do not promote multiple competing guilds. There is no penalty on death and you can't expect the server to pretend to care about PvP death just because that makes the server better.

The issue with Red is that the rules favor zerg mentality. It is a winner takes all environment so there can only be 1 end game raiding guild. You can't have 3 guilds in an area trying to do a first to engage. The zerg kills everyone else and takes all the content. There is no penalty on PvP death so the zerg will just overwhelm everyone else. Once the zerg wins they can sit on corpses and camp them until people get frustrated and quit for a couple days. It is why TMO had no chance on Red. Once a guild has taken the top spot there is nothing another guild can do until the number 1 guild gets banned or quits.

Top guilds:

Nihilum - banned
Holocaust/Empire - banned/quit
Apex - Current guild

Current issue with Red that will never be fixed by a community:

60 members of a guild looking at 20 members of a competing guild full of vets and highly skilled players. The 60 know they could take the 20 but might suffer 2-3 deaths a piece until their zerg finally overwhelms the 20. The zerg will not hesitate to throw away 2-3 deaths each to beat the 20, so the tight group of highly skilled 20 members eventually join the zerg if they want to do content and progress their character. You have to join the zerg no matter how much you dislike them or you just quit the server.

There is a way to fix it.

You can have item loot so small PvP guilds that focus on high kill/death ratios have something to do. This promotes anti-pk guilds. Top guilds wanting to zerg will not work because the losers that keep dieing over and over to get a dragon will lose items.

You can also hardcode it with teams but there still has to be some penalty on PvP death. Even with hardcoded teams people must have a need to protect their team from deaths.
  #648  
Old 10-16-2017, 12:14 PM
Lhancelot Lhancelot is offline
Planar Protector

Lhancelot's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 3,164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Top guilds:

Nihilum - banned
Holocaust/Empire - banned/quit
Apex - Current guild
This is why Nihilum was top guild for so long, it was the marketing genius of their recruiters.

Nihilum/Red recruitment video on Youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydjnPheTIhQ

If Cylocke and other Red recruiters really want Red to succeed and are serious about recruiting, I suggest they create some entertaining recruitment videos like this one!
  #649  
Old 10-16-2017, 04:23 PM
Rygar Rygar is offline
Planar Protector

Rygar's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,798
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It is 100% on the Devs to create a server that keeps a high population, not the community. Red started with bugs, cheats and soon made server rules that made the raid scene all about zerging.

You can't expect a community to go against the natural rules of the server to create an environment that is favorable for everyone. The server rules do not promote multiple competing guilds. There is no penalty on death and you can't expect the server to pretend to care about PvP death just because that makes the server better.

The issue with Red is that the rules favor zerg mentality. It is a winner takes all environment so there can only be 1 end game raiding guild. You can't have 3 guilds in an area trying to do a first to engage. The zerg kills everyone else and takes all the content. There is no penalty on PvP death so the zerg will just overwhelm everyone else. Once the zerg wins they can sit on corpses and camp them until people get frustrated and quit for a couple days. It is why TMO had no chance on Red. Once a guild has taken the top spot there is nothing another guild can do until the number 1 guild gets banned or quits.

Top guilds:

Nihilum - banned
Holocaust/Empire - banned/quit
Apex - Current guild

Current issue with Red that will never be fixed by a community:

60 members of a guild looking at 20 members of a competing guild full of vets and highly skilled players. The 60 know they could take the 20 but might suffer 2-3 deaths a piece until their zerg finally overwhelms the 20. The zerg will not hesitate to throw away 2-3 deaths each to beat the 20, so the tight group of highly skilled 20 members eventually join the zerg if they want to do content and progress their character. You have to join the zerg no matter how much you dislike them or you just quit the server.

There is a way to fix it.

You can have item loot so small PvP guilds that focus on high kill/death ratios have something to do. This promotes anti-pk guilds. Top guilds wanting to zerg will not work because the losers that keep dieing over and over to get a dragon will lose items.

You can also hardcode it with teams but there still has to be some penalty on PvP death. Even with hardcoded teams people must have a need to protect their team from deaths.
I played on Red during Live (Rallos Zek), talking early RZ when they can loot your weapons. Even after disallowing weapon loot, item loot was a huge barrier to entry. Worked my ass off to get a bronze breastplate on my warrior, got like nuked out in the karanas before my group knew what was up and some naked wiz or whatever loots my BP (probably right into a bag, so retribution is impossible).

It was super stressful and in the end I gave up and joined a blue server, made it to maybe level 34 on a human warrior. I had some fun times hunting griefers in the early levels around crushbone and steamfont, but it got annoying as you progressed and your item values increased.

Other guildies that played zek recalled melee's bagging their gear when their HP started dropping too low. No Drop loot for melee's was real hard to come by early.

Maybe item loot helps in the situation you're describing (at the end game), but I think it would make a huge barrier to entry for new players. Even twinking a character will be tougher (no fungis, haste, crafted / dropped armor sets would be safe). Maybe a hybrid of allowing item loot only 55+ (if you the killer are 55+ and the slain are also 55+).

I still think this presents balancing problems, people at the top as you say will stay at the top with better no-drop items (haste, big resist pieces, etc) as the lower levels try to claw their up in junkier gear.
__________________
Wedar - Level 60 Grandmaster <Azure Guard>
Check out my Zone Guide to The Hole
The Hole wiki now fully updated and accurate: Hole Wiki Page
  #650  
Old 10-16-2017, 04:56 PM
HippoNipple HippoNipple is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,095
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rygar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I played on Red during Live (Rallos Zek), talking early RZ when they can loot your weapons. Even after disallowing weapon loot, item loot was a huge barrier to entry. Worked my ass off to get a bronze breastplate on my warrior, got like nuked out in the karanas before my group knew what was up and some naked wiz or whatever loots my BP (probably right into a bag, so retribution is impossible).

It was super stressful and in the end I gave up and joined a blue server, made it to maybe level 34 on a human warrior. I had some fun times hunting griefers in the early levels around crushbone and steamfont, but it got annoying as you progressed and your item values increased.

Other guildies that played zek recalled melee's bagging their gear when their HP started dropping too low. No Drop loot for melee's was real hard to come by early.

Maybe item loot helps in the situation you're describing (at the end game), but I think it would make a huge barrier to entry for new players. Even twinking a character will be tougher (no fungis, haste, crafted / dropped armor sets would be safe). Maybe a hybrid of allowing item loot only 55+ (if you the killer are 55+ and the slain are also 55+).

I still think this presents balancing problems, people at the top as you say will stay at the top with better no-drop items (haste, big resist pieces, etc) as the lower levels try to claw their up in junkier gear.
Item loot doesn't work in Velious because of too much no drop gear.

It is perfect for classic/kunark with the best gear not being no drop gear but still having enough no drop pieces if you are scared to wear other gear.

In Kunark the items aren't game breaking either.

Another option is to make it less harsh by only allowing open inventory items not in containers, earrings, rings, necklace and bracers slots be lootable. This covers most resist gear through Kunark and allows melee/hybrid to maintain their AC/weapons.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:58 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.