Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-05-2019, 07:13 PM
Roth Roth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 257
Default Some core issues with antonica in classic eq(why everyone goes to guk)

So I am someone that has always wanted to go off the beaten path, but I've had a reality check the last couple days that made me realize what the core problems are.

-guk has an insane zem for no reason. Compare to cazicthule's zem of 85 and there is literally no reason to go to cazicthule over guk.

-guk has lower hp mobs. I don't know why this is, but in general it's just way easier to kill frogs. I brought a group to runnyeye and for some reason everything had insane hp.

-All the other dungeons have tons of healers, casters, or punishing mechanics. guk has this but not to the same degree.

So basically, if you actually try some of these unpopular zones, you'll realize really quick that there is just no reason to not go to guk. Honestly the original dev's just did a terrible job balancing the zones and since we're using all those values there's no way to fix it. There is just no good place to level other than guk 18+ on antonica if you actually want good exp, period.

edit: I forgot to add sol a/sol b and najena are fine as well. But your options are limited.
__________________
Shenethax - Iksar Shaman
Xerrick - Iksar Necromancer
Numdiar - High Elf Mage
Zekdos - Troll SK
Last edited by Roth; 11-05-2019 at 07:22 PM..
  #2  
Old 11-05-2019, 07:19 PM
derpcake2 derpcake2 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 400
Default

git guk
  #3  
Old 11-05-2019, 07:34 PM
jacob54311 jacob54311 is offline
Kobold

jacob54311's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 135
Default

This risk/reward issue has been a problem with EQ through out the time I played, not just classic.

Game design that pretty much strongly encourages players to ignore big parts of the game. I remember in Lost Dungeons of Norrath seemed like everyone would keep doing the same handful of dungeons over and over and over again, because of the way the rewards were set up.

Players will opt for repetition if it means making much faster progress. It's unfortunate. They kind of tried to do something about it with hot zones, but didn't go nearly as far as they could have, IMO. Imagine if zem's like the one in GUK moved around every week or month or whatever?
  #4  
Old 11-05-2019, 07:37 PM
Roth Roth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jacob54311 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This risk/reward issue has been a problem with EQ through out the time I played, not just classic.

Game design that pretty much strongly encourages players to ignore big parts of the game. I remember in Lost Dungeons of Norrath seemed like everyone would keep doing the same handful of dungeons over and over and over again, because of the way the rewards were set up.

Players will opt for repetition if it means making much faster progress. It's unfortunate. They kind of tried to do something about it with hot zones, but didn't go nearly as far as they could have, IMO. Imagine if zem's like the one in GUK moved around every week or month or whatever?
If the game was balanced to reward people properly, I think it would be a lot better. For example give runnyeye a 180 zem.... it's a hard zone and deserves it. Buff the zem in permafrost or ct.
__________________
Shenethax - Iksar Shaman
Xerrick - Iksar Necromancer
Numdiar - High Elf Mage
Zekdos - Troll SK
  #5  
Old 11-05-2019, 07:56 PM
branamil branamil is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 790
Default

Honestly the way they coded casters in this game just isnt worth it. They hit just as hard as warrior mobs but you also have to deal with the insane shit they cast, and through the walls and ceilings too.
  #6  
Old 11-05-2019, 07:57 PM
Keza Keza is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 124
Default

Idk. Guk is better overall but mostly I'd say because of loot. I trio'd a mage/war/dru on blue primarily in SolB and the exp was crazy good. We had no loot drops running the tunnel area of SolB that connects to SolA, but the exp was absurdly good and well made up for any design/loot deficits. The mobs I believe are warrior/shamans. I don't think SolB has wizards though, which I consider to be the worst mob to fight. There's a reason no one exps in places like perma/sola, and it's not just location. Getting nuked for 200+ blows.

This is one of those things where I wouldn't mind a small bit of non-classic interference, just to give people an actual reason to go to other places.
  #7  
Old 11-05-2019, 08:00 PM
jacob54311 jacob54311 is offline
Kobold

jacob54311's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Idk. Guk is better overall but mostly I'd say because of loot. I trio'd a mage/war/dru on blue primarily in SolB and the exp was crazy good. We had no loot drops running the tunnel area of SolB that connects to SolA, but the exp was absurdly good and well made up for any design/loot deficits. The mobs I believe are warrior/shamans. I don't think SolB has wizards though, which I consider to be the worst mob to fight. There's a reason no one exps in places like perma/sola, and it's not just location. Getting nuked for 200+ blows.

This is one of those things where I wouldn't mind a small bit of non-classic interference, just to give people an actual reason to go to other places.
Yeah. Tweaking the ZEM's in some of these zones so that they make more sense wouldn't really change how the game is played.
  #8  
Old 11-05-2019, 08:11 PM
Roth Roth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Idk. Guk is better overall but mostly I'd say because of loot. I trio'd a mage/war/dru on blue primarily in SolB and the exp was crazy good. We had no loot drops running the tunnel area of SolB that connects to SolA, but the exp was absurdly good and well made up for any design/loot deficits. The mobs I believe are warrior/shamans. I don't think SolB has wizards though, which I consider to be the worst mob to fight. There's a reason no one exps in places like perma/sola, and it's not just location. Getting nuked for 200+ blows.

This is one of those things where I wouldn't mind a small bit of non-classic interference, just to give people an actual reason to go to other places.
Solb has the same zem as lower guk, but the issue with sol b is that the mobs have higher hp. But solb isn't a deserted zone, it isn't nearly as problematic as some other places. Same with sol a - sol a is fine in comparison to the worst zones.
__________________
Shenethax - Iksar Shaman
Xerrick - Iksar Necromancer
Numdiar - High Elf Mage
Zekdos - Troll SK
  #9  
Old 11-05-2019, 09:09 PM
kabouter kabouter is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 68
Default

It is a simple fix, but for classic reasons won't be made. Perhaps in blue at one point?

But right now, unrest, crushbone, guk, etc... should have a lower ZEM to spread the population around a bit.

Guk has 1 of the highest ZEM's as well as the best loot.

Mix it up and keep it a secret in a way that mimics the classic feeling.
  #10  
Old 11-05-2019, 09:22 PM
glencastle glencastle is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kabouter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It is a simple fix, but for classic reasons won't be made. Perhaps in blue at one point?

But right now, unrest, crushbone, guk, etc... should have a lower ZEM to spread the population around a bit.

Guk has 1 of the highest ZEM's as well as the best loot.

Mix it up and keep it a secret in a way that mimics the classic feeling.
100% agree with this. I would LOVE the ZEM to be randomly changed
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.