a new server would be terrible

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Have a legacy /claim for each account. That way every is guaranteed their 1, but there is also the scarcity of not every character on an account will have it.

perfection [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Kohedron]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Have a legacy /claim for each account. That way every is guaranteed their 1, but there is also the scarcity of not every character on an account will have it.

Oh my god, that's just crazy enough to work!

Oh yeah that's right, people will just make 100 accounts and do the exact same thing they were doing.

This actually accomplishes exactly nothing

And don't say anything about IP's or MAC's, those are just as easy to get around

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Kohedron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh my god, that's just crazy enough to work!

Oh yeah that's right, people will just make 100 accounts and do the exact same thing they were doing.

This actually accomplishes exactly nothing

And don't say anything about IP's or MAC's, those are just as easy to get around

Thats part of the design. It allows Castle 2.0 to still create a huge stockpile of stones as is his wont while letting normies that barely care about legacy check that box and move on.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Kohedron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

people will just make 100 accounts and do the exact same thing they were doing.

Only 10 allowed.

[Kohedron]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Only 10 allowed.

Yeah because I'm sure everyone follows this rule.

Wow you guys are pretty impressive with the redacted bad takes

[plexx88]

Or release a server capped at Luclin.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Kohedron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah because I'm sure everyone follows this rule.

Wow you guys are pretty impressive with the redacted bad takes

Sorry, wrong forum. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[mycoolrausch]

I think it's weird to run a timelocked server with once ever legacy items. In live those legacy items became less relevant with every expansion (eye of zomm nerfed in luclin, all/all dark elf illusion in alchemy, manastone does nothing when you have 100k+ mana pools, etc etc etc), but that doesn't happen on a timelocked server forever stuck in the classic era.

If i was running one i'd bring em back for a couple weeks every 3 years or so, the timeline the classic trilogy existed. So they're rare and expensive but not unobtainable.

But I don't so it is what it is.

[Evia]

Originally Posted by mycoolrausch [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think it's weird to run a timelocked server with once ever legacy items. In live those legacy items became less relevant with every expansion (eye of zomm nerfed in luclin, all/all dark elf illusion in alchemy, manastone does nothing when you have 100k+ mana pools, etc etc etc), but that doesn't happen on a timelocked server forever stuck in the classic era.

If i was running one i'd bring em back for a couple weeks every 3 years or so, the timeline the classic trilogy existed. So they're rare and expensive but not unobtainable.

But I don't so it is what it is.

That's not a bad idea actually

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by plexx88 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Or release a server capped at Luclin.

Dunno this is where I would end a server tho. Maybe give pop AA's or something, would that be too powerful?