Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

View Poll Results: Do you live in one of America's inner cities?
Yes, I live in a but I got inner city 41 18.55%
Yes, I live in a crime infested inner city 35 15.84%
Yes, I live in a burning crime infested inner city 33 14.93%
Bush burned the crime infested towers 153 69.23%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 221. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #10121  
Old 03-26-2018, 01:19 PM
Raavak Raavak is offline
Planar Protector

Raavak's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Creepin' inta your back door.
Posts: 2,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
america has enough tanks to use tanks
We don't have that many tanks, and the ones we have are old enough to get classic license plates.
__________________
[60 Sorcerer] Rakpartha (Erudite)
[60 High Priest] Doktyr (Dwarf)
[25 Shadow Knight] Elandrea (Dark Elf)
  #10122  
Old 03-26-2018, 01:25 PM
Wonkie Wonkie is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raavak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We don't have that many tanks, and the ones we have are old enough to get classic license plates.
The tank debate between the Army and Congress goes back to 2012 when Odierno testified that "we don't need the tanks. Our tank fleet is two and a half years old on average now. We're in good shape and these are additional tanks that we don't need."

Todd Harrison, a Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments analyst, said it was open to question whether the Army and the Marine Corps needed more tanks on top of the estimated 9,000 already in their inventories

https://www.military.com/daily-news/...esnt-want.html
  #10123  
Old 03-26-2018, 01:45 PM
mickmoranis mickmoranis is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 5,664
Default

the tank debate? what is the tank debate?

Is this you pretending that libtards have known the number of tanks the us poses since 2012 or something?

When libs dont even know the difference between a winchester, an assualt riffle, and an assault weapon?

Psshhh sorry, NEXT
  #10124  
Old 03-26-2018, 01:51 PM
Raavak Raavak is offline
Planar Protector

Raavak's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Creepin' inta your back door.
Posts: 2,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
When libs dont even know the difference between a winchester, an assualt riffle, and an assault weapon?
Assault rifles look scary. Amirite?
__________________
[60 Sorcerer] Rakpartha (Erudite)
[60 High Priest] Doktyr (Dwarf)
[25 Shadow Knight] Elandrea (Dark Elf)
  #10125  
Old 03-26-2018, 01:55 PM
Patriam1066 Patriam1066 is offline
Planar Protector

Patriam1066's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonkie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The tank debate between the Army and Congress goes back to 2012 when Odierno testified that "we don't need the tanks. Our tank fleet is two and a half years old on average now. We're in good shape and these are additional tanks that we don't need."

Todd Harrison, a Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments analyst, said it was open to question whether the Army and the Marine Corps needed more tanks on top of the estimated 9,000 already in their inventories

https://www.military.com/daily-news/...esnt-want.html
Just admit you're Italian
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran
  #10126  
Old 03-26-2018, 01:56 PM
Ahldagor Ahldagor is offline
Planar Protector

Ahldagor's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
the tank debate? what is the tank debate?

Is this you pretending that libtards have known the number of tanks the us poses since 2012 or something?

When libs dont even know the difference between a winchester, an assualt riffle, and an assault weapon?

Psshhh sorry, NEXT
Winchester is a brand. An assault weapon would be a general label for a device used in an assualt like a knife or brass knuckles for specific examples. An assault rifle is a rifle which is a gun that has rifling on the inside surface of the barrel. The assault adjective usually implies compact and concealable in terms of weaponry.
__________________
  #10127  
Old 03-26-2018, 02:08 PM
mickmoranis mickmoranis is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 5,664
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Winchester is a brand. An assault weapon would be a general label for a device used in an assualt like a knife or brass knuckles for specific examples. An assault rifle is a rifle which is a gun that has rifling on the inside surface of the barrel. The assault adjective usually implies compact and concealable in terms of weaponry.
Win·ches·ter
ˈwinˌCHestər,ˈwin(t)SHəstər/
noun
noun: Winchester; plural noun: Winchesters; noun: Winchester rifle; plural noun: Winchester rifles; noun: Winchester disk; plural noun: Winchester disks

1. a breech-loading side-action repeating rifle.

what we have in this exhibit is what is known as a "2000's era american liberal" this creature belives that the definitions of things are what 'they think' they should be.

An assault riffle is a fully automatic rifle. Period. Not what you describe.

An assault weapon is a made up term that you and every single person you think is smart, all have a varrying opionion of what it is but holds the same number of bullets and fires at the same rate of fire as a winchester does.

Spoiler, it is nothing, its a made up pair of words that has no definition whatsoever.

Based off your description an assault weapon is the same as any weapon only it looks like something the military would use.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The assault adjective usually implies compact and concealable in terms of weaponry.
"The assault adjective usually implies"

yes, lets make legislation about stuff that "usually implies" [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"if it is implied that someone has an assault weapon the police should be able to arrest and detain you and confiscate your property"
  #10128  
Old 03-26-2018, 02:12 PM
Raavak Raavak is offline
Planar Protector

Raavak's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Creepin' inta your back door.
Posts: 2,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
An assault weapon is a made up term that you and every single person you think is smart, all have a varrying opionion of what it is but holds the same number of bullets and fires at the same rate of fire as a winchester does.
When I see assault weapon I think SAW or maybe M60 or grenade launcher if you're old school.
__________________
[60 Sorcerer] Rakpartha (Erudite)
[60 High Priest] Doktyr (Dwarf)
[25 Shadow Knight] Elandrea (Dark Elf)
  #10129  
Old 03-26-2018, 02:15 PM
mickmoranis mickmoranis is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 5,664
Default

its fair to think whatever you want, becuse there is no definition for the word assault weapon.

It means anything you want it to mean.

Like for example, libs use it to describe a scary looking gun. But what they really mean is ALL GUNS and to REPEAL THE SECOND AMENDMENT they just haven't figured that out yet cus they just parrot whatever they hear someone else with a similar haircut yelling.
  #10130  
Old 03-26-2018, 02:39 PM
Wonkie Wonkie is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just admit you're Italian
i have blue eyes (-:
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.