#11
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#12
|
||||
|
Quote:
The unguilded puller has been used before without incident. IB also had an unguilded puller. Golden was not guilded simply because it's a pain in the ass to find an officer for a bard who is only used for fay and sev who is bound at the TD pots via locket. TMO has so many alts that it can be hard to find an actual officer at times. Especially for Faydedar. I have a 56 wizard I use for raids who was unguilded for a while because it was a pain in my ass to find an officer. It's a complete red herring to say that there was no pick up raid forming; there's no need for a PUG. Golden is a TMO member even if that character wasn't tagged. It was a TMO operation through and through, and the guild was assembling in good faith for the kill. Certainly you're not suggesting that we used an untagged puller to circumvent the rules. We're many things, but unaware of the rules we are not. It would be monumentally stupid to try and get around the rules like that. It's not about conscience, it's about convenience. An officer was present, so the bard was tagged. Just about every Fay, Naggy, and Vox raid with officers present sees a new character join the guild. Please explain to me what you think we did that's so shady, and why it's wrong.
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6 | |||
|
#13
|
|||
|
Don't really see a double standard here. Both guilds got banned.
Title irrelevant unless IB's is reversed. For the record, I doubt TMO was attempting some new diabolical pull tactic... Hanlon's Razor: 'Do not attribute to Malice what can be attributed to Incompetence.' (or in this case, forgetfulness) | ||
|
#14
|
|||
|
You bring the Forum PR Police out of hiding. (5)
Xasten, you still didn't address why/how he was tagged, which is basically the entire premise of my point. It looks shadier to tag him than leave him unguilded. Lots of words with failure to answer the most important question mark = TMOMO. | ||
|
#15
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#16
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#17
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
What you're failing to address is why this was unethical or shady. My wizard Xastex was tagged on a raid, my rogue Eyashusa was tagged on a Vox raid, and my monk Sakkra was tagged on a Naggy raid. Was this unethical? These characters were untagged because it's a pain in the ass sometimes to find an officer. Alts that were previously tagged were guildless after Zeelot disbanded the guild. Explain to me how I've not addressed your point. And please drop the forum police schtick.
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6 | ||||
|
#18
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#19
|
||||
|
Quote:
Surely you can see the precedent this sets. Guilds that can't field trackers can now hire trackers. If we have un-guilded trackers acting as mercenaries to the highest bidder, I wonder which guild that benefits most? Why would any of us have reason to believe you would treat this new precedent with integrity? | |||
|
#20
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I notice you've switched the tone from saying this is shady to saying that it's bad policy prone to abuse. I also notice you've failed to address the questions I posed back at you. For someone who rails against evading the question, you sure seem to do it a lot.
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6 | |||||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|