I N D I C T E D

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Jaxon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Things that will surely be Trump's demise:

• Trump collusion
• Trump obstruction
• Trump paying Stormy
• Trump foundation
• Trump not gloating

you make a pretty good case for impeachment

[Jaxon]

Impeachment is trading at a 90 day low, now is the time to get in on the action:

https://www.predictit.org/markets/de...his-first-term

[AenorVZ]

It's over. Trump wins. Move to resolved.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4...rds-related-to

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Jaxon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Impeachment is trading at a 90 day low, now is the time to get in on the action:

https://www.predictit.org/markets/de...his-first-term

buy the dip!!

fuck now i want clam dip

[Jaxon]

Oh, you're referring to the time Trump asked his lawyer to do something, and his lawyer told Trump that it was a bad idea, and then Trump ended up taking his lawyer's advice and didn't ask him to do it any more. Taking good legal advice from your attorney is not obstruction of justice.

[feniin]

So what you're saying is that he would definitely be a criminal if his staff didn't intervene?

[Jaxon]

I'm saying that if you believe the president is a criminal it's stupid and self-defeating to criticize him for not being a criminal. That's what they call scoring an own goal.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Jaxon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's what they call scoring an own goal.

So you're saying the libs are owned by the executive branch not indicting itself?

[Jaxon]

Without evidence this is not a good faith argument. The critics of the president defended the executive branch as an impartial and dispassionate agent of justice and were ready to accept their verdict as legitimate right up until the moment the executive branch came to a conclusion that they disagreed with.

[Wonkie]

Originally Posted by Jaxon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Without evidence this is not a good faith argument. The critics of the president defended the executive branch as an impartial and dispassionate agent of justice and were ready to accept their verdict as legitimate right up until the moment the executive branch came to a conclusion that they disagreed with.

there's no such thing as a good faith argument, noob