Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Bugs > Velious Beta > Mechanics

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 01-28-2023, 09:18 PM
long.liam long.liam is offline
Kobold


Join Date: May 2019
Location: US
Posts: 198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think the issue is the scale for mob hp is broken.

IIRC max aggro should be achieved on mobs with hp in the ball park of the higher level DL giants.

I wouldn't be surprised if the implementation here doesn't achieve max aggro until the mobs have 10s of thousands of hp instead.



Original game vast majority of people were using like 6/27 weapons til pas their teens. Of course it was easier for low level SKs to keep aggro against this instead of rogues backstabbing with 13 dmg weapons.




The comments said things like it needed to be repeatedly cast. Obviously the current implementation seems to have underboiled the egg, but the previous was equally wrong.

2 DCs and MAYBE a shadow and you were keeping aggro an entire fight versus very twinked out melees. I don't think that fell under the scope of 'repeatedly'?




Obsidian daggers won't be effective at this point in the servers, even pre nerf. Maybe offhand one while your dual wield doesn't produce many swings (they can proc even if they don't swing), but you need a much better ratio primary to generate consistent white aggro.
The formula for Spell Effect hate is Mob HP/15, so to hit the max of 1200 you would need to cast on a mob with at least 18,000 HP.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-28-2023, 09:29 PM
long.liam long.liam is offline
Kobold


Join Date: May 2019
Location: US
Posts: 198
Default

Also, there is a ton of evidence that Spells debuff spell effect hate is supposed to scale based off of level. Many of them from the EQ devs in Era:

"--- We've capped the amount of hate that can be awarded to most
casters, specifically for debuff-type spells like the Malo and Tash
series. The hate calculation for these spells takes into account the
number of hitpoints of the NPC and did not "play nice" with the
increased HP limit of Velious. It explains why Enchanters, for
instance, would complain that casting a Tash spell would lead to near-
instant death."

https://everquest.allakhazam.com/his...es-2001-1.html

This has been well researched before. It would take take a ton evidence from Player logs in Era and developer posts in era to convince P99 Devs that this change is wrong. The only thing is broken right now is the Disease and Poison counter hate was mistakenly removed for some reason.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-02-2023, 09:14 PM
ratweed ratweed is offline
Large Rat


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 9
Default

I miss using infestation. please fix this.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-11-2023, 03:44 AM
Octavian Octavian is offline
Sarnak

Octavian's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: True center...
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The comments said things like it needed to be repeatedly cast. Obviously the current implementation seems to have underboiled the egg, but the previous was equally wrong.

2 DCs and MAYBE a shadow and you were keeping aggro an entire fight versus very twinked out melees. I don't think that fell under the scope of 'repeatedly'?
Depends on the fight... if I'm grouped and the mob is gonna die in <30sec, then yeah 1-2 DC's was prob sufficient. However, for raids I was not only spamming DC but using GCD to weave other spells in for extra hate, all of which was necessary. Your assessment is a gross oversimplification and really only applies to shorter duration fights. No SK on P99 would have held aggro on a raid target for >a minute or two with 1-2 DC casts prior to the patch.

The way DC was functioning was as intended. It worked extremely well in group situations (SK's have always been group tank gods) and it required nonstop spamming during raid tanking. There was nothing about it that needed to be changed, and live EQ only dropped it when they were ready to implement its replacement, the terror line, which preserved SK's as aggro gods.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-11-2023, 03:49 AM
Octavian Octavian is offline
Sarnak

Octavian's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: True center...
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by long.liam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also, there is a ton of evidence that Spells debuff spell effect hate is supposed to scale based off of level. Many of them from the EQ devs in Era:

"--- We've capped the amount of hate that can be awarded to most
casters, specifically for debuff-type spells like the Malo and Tash
series. The hate calculation for these spells takes into account the
number of hitpoints of the NPC and did not "play nice" with the
increased HP limit of Velious. It explains why Enchanters, for
instance, would complain that casting a Tash spell would lead to near-
instant death."

https://everquest.allakhazam.com/his...es-2001-1.html

This has been well researched before. It would take take a ton evidence from Player logs in Era and developer posts in era to convince P99 Devs that this change is wrong. The only thing is broken right now is the Disease and Poison counter hate was mistakenly removed for some reason.
For sure, this agrees with the point of this thread - fix disease cloud. It should still be our primary aggro spell and it should work well.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-14-2023, 11:11 AM
Drueric Drueric is offline
Kobold

Drueric's Avatar

Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 132
Default

I thought warriors were the ones designed to taunt and hold boss agro in raids. I mean, if sk's are expecting to have this role(casting their newb level spells), then what are warriors good for? I mean if there is bug here, then it needs to be fixed. What is the bug? Im only asking because this is the bugs section.
Last edited by Drueric; 02-14-2023 at 11:14 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.