That desk throw

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seems the kids in the class have been given a gag order to stay quiet by either admin authority, parents, or through fear of reprisal if they comment. I can't blame them. Orruar may not have considered as to why there is a lack of information. Seems he expects some very adult things from children.

Ah yes, these scared kids, at least 3 of whom were recording this incident and posted it on the internet. Clearly they were all scared into keeping quiet. Regardless, I'll hold any kind of judgment on this until the facts come out. The girl's family is apparently pressing the matter and so we may get some court time to help discover the truth. Meanwhile, everyone else loves jumping to conclusions based on a 10 second video clip.

[Pokesan]

You can't really claim to be holding back judgment when you've already licked police boot repeatedly in this very thread.

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ah yes, these scared kids, at least 3 of whom were recording this incident and posted it on the internet. Clearly they were all scared into keeping quiet. Regardless, I'll hold any kind of judgment on this until the facts come out. The girl's family is apparently pressing the matter and so we may get some court time to help discover the truth. Meanwhile, everyone else loves jumping to conclusions based on a 10 second video clip.

Milk the system for every penny... god bless America.

[Skittlez]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

...

Do you really think the goal was just to get her outside of the classroom? Whatever she had done warranted at least a trip to the principle's office given that the school cop had to be called in. Was he going to drag her and her desk all the way there? He was going to have to remove her from the desk sooner or later, so perhaps the most efficient way to do so would be to do it sooner rather than later?

Do you really think a teenager would sit in a lone desk in a hall for any real amount of time? Beside the point, there are significantly better ways then throwing her back and throwing her across the floor. He's a police officer and she's just a kid. He could have detained her limbs and put them behind her back with the same effort that he put in to throwing her. Your a fucking idiot to think otherwise.

[Zack Morris]

The force appears warranted.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Skittlez [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you really think a teenager would sit in a lone desk in a hall for any real amount of time? Beside the point, there are significantly better ways then throwing her back and throwing her across the floor. He's a police officer and she's just a kid. He could have detained her limbs and put them behind her back with the same effort that he put in to throwing her. Your a fucking idiot to think otherwise.

Thought everyone, including Orruar, was in agreement the force used was poor judgement and incredibly dangerous?

Apparently I am hearing this officer has a history of possible bad judgement.

Also Orruar denying her entry the next day would be safer because she wouldn't be able to stonewall or create a more dangerous situation by being locked into a desk. The officer could just block her, tell her shes not allowed on the premise today, and to go home or face arrest.

Arresting a standing person is very simple and the officer is very well-trained on making arrests in the standing position and SAFE TACTICS and protocol on making a standard arrest, with regards to to gaining compliance and stopping resistance while in a standing struggle.

This was incredibly violent and dangerous. And shame on the school for putting the officer into this situation. The teacher, the principle, and everyone involved in calling the officer to this situation to act as a PRIVATE BOUNCER.

Again, we do not know if the girl was breaking any actual laws other than texting and using a cellphone. If so, this is even more disgusting on the schools part. And the Sheriff needs to ban these types of bar-room bouncer situations.

Sending an officer to demand her cellphone? Its an officers job to confiscate a girls cellphone because she is texting?

Hello police state. At least the Sheriff recognizes its very bullshit to even have officers injected into these situations. And constitutional rights were definitely violated here. The officer had no right to attempt cellphone confiscation without probable cause for a CRIMINAL investigation or as part of a criminal investigation. Such as playing loud music, disturbing the peace, overheard selling drugs on the phone, etc. Which she obviously was not. Silently texting with a few beeps is legal. That is a school admin problem, not a law enforcement problem. Shame on the school and the thugs involved.

[iruinedyourday]

How to deal with kids:

http://www.attn.com/stories/3894/dc-...paign=internal

"Instead of us fighting, she tried to turn it around and make it something fun," Aaliyah Taylor, the 17-year-old senior who dance-battled the as-yet unnamed cop told the Washington Post. "I never expected cops to be that cool."

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We need more details.

IMO no we dont. What we see in the video is excessive force, it makes no difference what the girl was 'suspected' of doing prior or what the officer thinks he saw her do before... its not up to him to decide whether she is guilty and deserves to be violently attacked by a police officer.

There are plenty of examples of non excessive force and that's what this officer decided not to use because what the video does show is he obviously has anger management issues, which should prevent him from being a police officer in the first place.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

IMO no we dont. What we see in the video is excessive force, it makes no difference what the girl was 'suspected' of doing prior or what the officer thinks he saw her do before... its not up to him to decide whether she is guilty and deserves to be violently attacked by a police officer.

There are plenty of examples of non excessive force and that's what this officer decided not to use because what the video does show is he obviously has anger management issues, which should prevent him from being a police officer in the first place.

Yeah I am leaning towards this entire arrest being illegal. Unless the principle had notified her she was suspended and is now trespassing.

This smells like a real potential bumblefuck of legal problems, excessive force being one of them. The fact excessive force happened without dotting all their I's and crossing their T's could make things worse.

Especially if the initial complaint was she wouldn't stop using her cellphone and refused to hand over her personal property.

Edit: More details are out, he is known as a head-breaker and chief brutal enforcer at the school for a few years now, and a bodybuilding guy so possible steroid use. He has beat up a lot of people. I am so surprised [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]