Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #881  
Old 08-26-2022, 05:12 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 6,157
Default

Just keep racking up the silly posts. It just discredits you further[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is Troxx's data for reference. It is using his own standards of being in a group for an extended period of time. He is doing... 79 DPS (without damage shield). It is the precise number I calculated. His DPS is 40 simply because he is nuking more per encounter, but math-wise this also means they aren't pulling mobs that fast. His previous encounter data shows an average kill speed of 36 seconds, and he has yet to provide average kill speed for this data set.

There are two ways you can interpret this data:

1. You can believe Troxx, who is claiming his DPS parser is undervaluing the data by 30%. If that is true, then honestly all of the data he has posted so far is meaningless because his parser is wrong, and he needs to get a better parser.

2. GamParse did it's job and parsed Troxx's DPS correctly. The reason why he thinks the data is undervalued by 30% is because his similarly equipped Monk can do 70 DPS when he isn't pulling. That is where he is getting the 30% number, 70 x 0.7 = 49. The flaw in Troxx's logic is the Monk is only losing 30% DPS because he is pulling, NOT because the parser is wrong. Troxx isn't pulling, he is just sitting in camp DPSing and parsing. He is not losing any DPS, so there is no 30% loss for him. He is basically falsely assuming that if the Monk loses 30% DPS, everybody else is losing 30% DPS too. The parser is correct, and Troxx is wrong.

Either way, he basically has nothing to back up his silly points. The burden of proof now lies on him to either provide better data, or prove his parser is undervaluing all DPS by 30%, and not just the Monk who is pulling lol.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638 - Here is real objective data for DPS comparisons between a Mage and a Shaman, using a level 49 Sebilis Mob. A Shaman can do 55.2 DPS, a Mage can do 82.7 with damage shield. The difference is only 27.5 DPS. This is a level 60 Mage vs. a level 60 Shaman, no clickies or mana buffs, and assuming the group is killing a mob every 36 seconds.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #882  
Old 08-26-2022, 05:12 PM
cyxthryth cyxthryth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just keep racking up the silly posts. It just discredits you further[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Please ignore the trolls. Anybody can look at the post history of people who think they aren't trolling.

For people who want the current data:
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You can claim there is evidence of trolling in my post history, but that does not make it a fact. Please provide evidence?
Reply With Quote
  #883  
Old 08-26-2022, 05:21 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 3,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just keep racking up the silly posts. It just discredits you further[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We’re all still waiting for you to join a high dps group and show us what you’re capable of.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #884  
Old 08-26-2022, 05:24 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 6,157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We’re all still waiting for you to join a high dps group and show us what you’re capable of.
We are all still waiting for you to provide any data that you don't claim is inaccurate[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Your current data disproves your points. You should be able to prove your parser is underestimating all DPS by 30%, and not conveniently just the Monk who is pulling. I have hard evidence. You have data you claim isn't accurate. The burden of proof is on you.

For people who want the current data:

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Here is Troxx's data for reference. It is using his own standards of being in a group for an extended period of time. He is doing... 79 DPS (without damage shield). It is the precise number I calculated. His DPS is 40 simply because he is nuking more per encounter, but math-wise this also means they aren't pulling mobs that fast. His previous encounter data shows an average kill speed of 36 seconds, and he has yet to provide average kill speed for this data set.

There are two ways you can interpret this data:

1. You can believe Troxx, who is claiming his DPS parser is undervaluing the data by 30%. If that is true, then honestly all of the data he has posted so far is meaningless because his parser is wrong, and he needs to get a better parser.

2. GamParse did it's job and parsed Troxx's DPS correctly. The reason why he thinks the data is undervalued by 30% is because his similarly equipped Monk can do 70 DPS when he isn't pulling. That is where he is getting the 30% number, 70 x 0.7 = 49. The flaw in Troxx's logic is the Monk is only losing 30% DPS because he is pulling, NOT because the parser is wrong. Troxx isn't pulling, he is just sitting in camp DPSing and parsing. He is not losing any DPS, so there is no 30% loss for him. He is basically falsely assuming that if the Monk loses 30% DPS, everybody else is losing 30% DPS too. The parser is correct, and Troxx is wrong.

Either way, he basically has nothing to back up his silly points. The burden of proof now lies on him to either provide better data, or prove his parser is undervaluing all DPS by 30%, and not just the Monk who is pulling lol.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638 - Here is real objective data for DPS comparisons between a Mage and a Shaman, using a level 49 Sebilis Mob. A Shaman can do 55.2 DPS, a Mage can do 82.7 with damage shield. The difference is only 27.5 DPS. This is a level 60 Mage vs. a level 60 Shaman, no clickies or mana buffs, and assuming the group is killing a mob every 36 seconds.
__________________
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 08-26-2022 at 05:30 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #885  
Old 08-26-2022, 05:25 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 3,752
Default

11 pages to go
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #886  
Old 08-26-2022, 05:25 PM
cyxthryth cyxthryth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
For people who want the current data:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Please ignore the trolls. Anybody can look at the post history of people who think they aren't trolling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You can claim there is evidence of trolling in my post history, but that does not make it a fact. Please provide evidence?
Reply With Quote
  #887  
Old 08-26-2022, 05:30 PM
plzrelax plzrelax is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 108
Default

I think you need a vacation
Reply With Quote
  #888  
Old 08-26-2022, 05:33 PM
cyxthryth cyxthryth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by plzrelax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think you need a vacation
Username checks out. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reply With Quote
  #889  
Old 08-26-2022, 05:46 PM
Karanis Karanis is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Correct lol. I failed to prove it lol, and now I'm in full meltdown mode lol.
Reply With Quote
  #890  
Old 08-26-2022, 06:02 PM
Karanis Karanis is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Please ignore me. I am an absolute dumbfuck. I wish I could make coherent points, but unfortunately it's not possible to have a rational conversation with me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.