Rules Clarification Request

[Aesop]

Originally Posted by GradnerLives [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For example:

Someone roots a kiting bard: no one cares because they put themselves in that situation with the possibility of pvp.

Someone dispells a chanter pet: no one cares because they put themselves in that situation with the possibility of pvp.

Someone dispells a slowed raid mob: suspend them for a week.

Seems backwards given that the first two are almost guaranteed to cause XP loss to a levelling character who has no recourse or defense besides maybe running away. In the last case you're essentially rendering a raid force untouchable unless you have 7+ people when their XP loss is basically meaningless to 99% of their players by comparison to the first two.

[Pikrib]

Originally Posted by Andrei Chikatilo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This guy is the funniest person ever man WEW

Thanks guy who's forum avatar is a child molester.

[Cylock]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[vouss]

Originally Posted by Lasher

Ok so if its just one person diseplling its not ok. Thanks for clarifying

Yeah that makes sense, as long as you have force to attack the mob), OR you are there to PvP (this is clear if there are at least 2 people present) you can dispell the mob.

For reference could we get the number of players and class compositions required to kill each mob in velious?

[GradnerLives]

Originally Posted by Cylock [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah, there's been some light trolling/spinning in this thread. There have also been some past and present examples provided of contradictory enforcement.

It can get silly when the word of the law starts dictating the spirit rather than the other way around. I think that's what we're looking at with a lot of these cases.

[Aesop]

Just because you don't understand the nuance and history in a discussion Cylock doesn't mean it's being "spun". You are talking to a group of people, some of whom have had individual play sessions longer than you have been on the server. 140 IQ doesn't make you better than us.

[dink]

nothing like a GM Showing up to mass pvp in a confined space as an ogre on 3 seperate occasions within a 5 minute window.

[Gustoo]

This is an awesome thread it looks like everyone here plays the game.

Good work guys.

[vouss]

if cylock truly wants to help the server, he will educate himself on red99 mechanics and rules

then, he needs to step back and stop using this as a popularity and attention outlet

[necro316]

Originally Posted by Cwall 146.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

if cylock truly wants to help the server, he will educate himself on red99 mechanics and rules

then, he needs to step back and stop using this as a popularity and attention outlet