Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Melee

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2016, 01:00 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 3,754
Default Velium swiftblade - bards

So I just picked one of these up, going to bail on my Guardian's mace. Reasoning for this was that my melee damage is pretty crap to begin with, so i'm not often using my weapons if I'm truly trying to optimize my contribution. Mostly it was to free up my belt for something better than a Sash of the Dragonborn and to sell that off for some more cash to fund some sorely needed upgrades for my shaman.

Being that most of my melee damage came from my primary hand and it's damage bonus to begin with, do you guys feel that 13% more haste modifying my 10/18 primary (and more frequent damage bonus application to boot) will allow this to generate comparable dps (or ... maybe more dps??) in downgrading my offhand ratio from 14/24 to 5/24. Bear in mind that bard dual wield caps at 210 and we don't get double attack. I'm not sure how often dual wield actually triggers, but it can't be more than 60-65% of the time.

For the reasons listed in paragraph 1, I won't regret this shift for one minute, my question is simply:

1. Pathetic bard melee dps with 10/18 primary and 14/24 and 23% haste
2. Pathetic bard melee dps with 10/18 primary and 5/24 with 36% haste

Will ...

a) 1 > 2
b) 1 = 2
c) 2 > 1

Bearing in mind that the real answer regardless is

d) bard melee dps is ass, and if i really cared about my own dps alone I could stack dots for ~60dps in spell damage in a situation where I could twist in aoe dots on top of single target chants

But ... A B or C?

Thoughts from other fellow gimpy-melee bards?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
  #2  
Old 01-17-2016, 05:01 PM
DarthMartigan DarthMartigan is offline
Kobold


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 137
Default

Pretty sure losing haste on your main isn't a good idea. Haste from that weapon only affects that weapon from my understanding.
  #3  
Old 01-17-2016, 05:02 PM
DarthMartigan DarthMartigan is offline
Kobold


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 137
Default

Also, I think ratio only thing that matters for offhand.
  #4  
Old 01-17-2016, 05:03 PM
DarthMartigan DarthMartigan is offline
Kobold


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 137
Default

Also, since i can't edit these, I think you can just assume you won't contribute melee dps pre epic on a bard and just do instruments and not feel bad about melee.
  #5  
Old 01-17-2016, 06:08 PM
blondeattk blondeattk is offline
Planar Protector

blondeattk's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 1,130
Default

`On to this weapon: It stinks for melee. Great for bow kiting, etc., but there are much better weapons that paired with a 22% haste item like SCHW will give you MUCH more melee damage.`

read backward from here:

http://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/i...01172474220302

seems it does affect both hands.
__________________
"I have been freed from the shackles of pixel lust."

Are YOU Cleansed from the chains of digital desire?
  #6  
Old 01-17-2016, 07:15 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 3,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DarthMartigan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pretty sure losing haste on your main isn't a good idea. Haste from that weapon only affects that weapon from my understanding.
Worn haste acts as worn haste regardless if it comes from your boots, your belt, your cloak, or your weapon. The 36% haste is applied to all weapons.

10/14.6 + 14/19.5 worn 23% haste
10/13.2 + 5/17.6 worn 36% haste -- 10% mainhand advantage, worse offhand

If you factor in 60% spell haste from an enchanter.

10/9.83 + 14/13.11 (83% total haste)
10/9.18 + 5/12.24 (96% total haste) - 7% mainhand advantage, worse offhand

For most melee classes who possess double attack and higher dual wield skill caps, this would be a no brainer "bad" upgrade. A monk, ranger, warrior, or rogue would have to be smoking crack to even consider this. My question is posed to the knowledgeable chaps out there good with math. Bard melee dps is bad to begin with. Without double attack and higher dual wield skill caps, the lion's share of my damage already came from my primary hand's swings and damage bonus. In this case, it amplifies what was already the majority of my dps while decreasing the effectiveness of my offhand's direct contribution.

old > new?
old = new?
old < new?

(the real answer still being that it doesn't really matter as bard melee dps is pathetic)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
  #7  
Old 01-17-2016, 10:13 PM
brecon brecon is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 432
Default

It depends on your level. Lower levels where your dual wield skill is super low, you probably generate more dps from a faster mainhand than from a better ratio offhand.

If you are soloing post-40 or so, pre-epic you really won't be using your weapons: you will be using your drum for chant or fear kiting, a horn for aoe kiting, and a drum or a lute for charming.

The exception is if you are mez-soloing a named in a tight space and regenning in between, in which case you will probably be using melee weapons instead of dots so that you can lock down the mob again. This is a slow way to kill anything.

In a full xp-group when you are doing dps...the difference between haste percentage and the ratio is so minimal to the total group output that I wouldn't really sweat it.

My suggestion: get gear that prioritizes what bards need to do: (1) get procs on weapons like orb of tishan and epic, (2) mez, (3) survive playing a CC with minimal help from healers, (4) lull and pull, and (5) for raids resist fears and roots for kiting. So what you really want to prioritize in gear is:

Dex until ~110 (for procs and for fewer missed notes) > Resists > HP > Cha > AC

Nowhere on my list of Bard priorities is Haste or High-Ratio weapons.
  #8  
Old 01-18-2016, 03:45 AM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 3,754
Default

Any reason for a goal of ~110 dex? Genuinely curious as that number seems pretty specific, but lower than I would have guessed to maximize missed notes or procs.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
  #9  
Old 01-18-2016, 08:47 AM
brecon brecon is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 432
Default

In my own experiments it feels like there are thresholds of dex over which you get far less missed notes, with one at ~90 and one at ~110. This might just be superstition as I've never parsded it.
  #10  
Old 01-18-2016, 08:48 AM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 3,754
Default

Good to know, thanks. I've never parsed it either but sitting at 120 unbuffed is why i ask. I know more is always better but any info on diminishing returns is nice (if there at all). I've never parsed either, but i've never had > 130 unbuffed dex and i HATE missed notes.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.