Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-13-2018, 01:51 PM
derpcake2 derpcake2 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 400
Default

dear OP

i'm sure nilborg cares a lot
  #32  
Old 11-13-2018, 03:20 PM
White_knight White_knight is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,206
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Not sure how Tune destroyed Red99. A FFA, classic [no boxing], low pop pvp server is going to always have one large guild on top. If you look at every period of the box's history, it has been dominated by a single guild, with the exception of a two week period here and there. I could type paragraph after paragraph about why that is, but I'll spare everyone including myself that labor. It's not a Tune problem, it's a classic EQ problem.
My statement was false in the sense I didnt specify a specific timeline. However, Tune was definately a factor in the death of this server in the later stages post Empire.

Example: He'd go out of his way to kill mobs like VS and Trak while farming ToV just to stop smaller guilds from getting any content, this while 60 of the remaining 100 players on the server were in his guild.

It's true only 1 guild dominates red99- but that's an easy feat during classic and kunark where you could clear the content in a day, and where it wasn't so drastic of a setback for other guilds/players to catch up in terms of the gear curve.

However, no one can justify during Velious era besides maybe VP Dragon's any reason for a guild farming ToV/Kael to go kill kunark dragons - it was simply a tactic to stunt any other guilds growth - on a 100 pop server remember.

Edit: also at this stage anyone who was/had been in a tov raiding guild had 1-2-3 geared velious toons so people were just farming ToV for alts and Vuulak yet the destructive, obsessive mentality persisted.

Edit2: It's the nature of the player's/leaders that ruin this game, coupled with the lack of content in classic and kunark that cant sustain more than 250-300players.
I guess my point is that one can rule the roost and let other's flourish in the content they don't need, or you can make decisions that make people stop investing their game time.
Last edited by White_knight; 11-13-2018 at 03:33 PM..
  #33  
Old 11-13-2018, 03:38 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Kiss the ring or buzz off
  #34  
Old 11-13-2018, 03:42 PM
White_knight White_knight is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,206
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HippoNipple [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I was talking about this with a member from Dentists the other night and he was arguing how guilds like Catalyst ruined servers because they recruit more than is needed to down mobs. He was wanting something like 5 guilds with 10 members each and that will never happen. The 4 guilds that are losing won't stand by and let the 1 winning guild with 10 people that play 16 hours a day take all the content. You also leave out everyone on the server that wants to play but can only log in for 4 hours a day. If you only have 10 spots someone that plays 20 hours a week can't join. The casuals normally end up in the best guilds because they like to be able to log in and do stuff when they play games.
People who want servers broken up into small guilds are actually pussies - we all know skill levels vary and class inbalances are strong in EQ. So all a 10v10v10v10v10 guild setup would result in is 10v10v10v10v10 wizards of the likes and all the sub-par skilled and casuals would be worse of.

Plus those sorts of concepts are born out of the ideas from people who flourish in group PvP and would just dominate anyhow so they want to prescribe the server to their most dominating tactic. It's the reverse zerg in otherwords, same mentality though.
  #35  
Old 11-13-2018, 06:31 PM
Tassador Tassador is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,904
Default

Anyone believing these guys are only playing 20 hours a week?
  #36  
Old 11-13-2018, 06:43 PM
Ignight Ignight is offline
Fire Giant

Ignight's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 513
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by derpcake2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
dear OP

i'm sure nilborg cares a lot
LoL
  #37  
Old 11-13-2018, 07:06 PM
Bazia Bazia is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,152
Default

remember when cast spammed gay porn 11 times a day for 2 years on these forums and cyber stalked the staff IRL and doxxed them relentlessly with infographics

that's probably why they aint wiping 4got about the macequesters among us, thanks ronald reagan
Last edited by Bazia; 11-13-2018 at 07:08 PM..
  #38  
Old 11-13-2018, 11:47 PM
heartbrand heartbrand is offline
Planar Protector

heartbrand's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The Wire
Posts: 9,758
Default

If only Tune left Talendor up we’d be witnessing 300 pop and guilds gearing up with dragon hero bracers ready to take a shot at contesting for box supremacy
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle"
  #39  
Old 11-14-2018, 05:44 AM
ApexNews ApexNews is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 74
Default

all of kunark other than PD was left up for the majority of apex's lifetime, which did not even begin until the server was like 5+ years old, a year after the last content had been released.

nihilum had a vice grip on kunark killing every mob on spawn for years

holocaust steamrolled velious with 90 players.

tune killed vulak with 30 and ruined it for everyone. taylorswift_ok.gif

sorry you didn't get what you wanted out of the server.
  #40  
Old 11-14-2018, 08:05 AM
kotton05 kotton05 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,732
Default

nexona was never touched and it’s a dam shame.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.