Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Tanks

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-06-2019, 12:31 AM
Pint Pint is offline
Planar Protector

Pint's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Plane of Hate
Posts: 2,024
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
How are you guys getting these numbers?
They're making them up
__________________
Pint
  #22  
Old 04-06-2019, 01:04 AM
Sonderbeast Sonderbeast is offline
Planar Protector

Sonderbeast's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,304
Default

My question is: Why do warriors hate tables so much in the first place?
__________________
Draconite - 60 Warlord
Sond Cerulean - 58 Preserver



Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean View Post

If you have proof of a staff member violating policies, you report it in a Forum PM to me [Rogean] or Nilbog.
  #23  
Old 04-06-2019, 03:23 AM
aaezil aaezil is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,754
Default

Epic seems better willsapper seems worse. Wonder what class that guy who said sapper is better now plays?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx View Post
I tried my hand at rotating with the casuals.
It was at this point I decided to no longer be kind to the casuals as they have extreme short term memory. They did this to themselves, unfortunately.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maner View Post
No one in A/A cares that you aren't getting pixels. In fact after the last suspension wave the attitude is to stop letting the casual guilds get anything even remotely of value.
  #24  
Old 04-06-2019, 12:21 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 3,745
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They're making them up
For now? Yeah we pretty much are. Prior to the patch this stuff was pretty well understood in a more generalized sense.

Poison counter ~300 threat per counter
Disease counter about the same per counter
Stun around 450-500
Blind about the same
Snare ~250-300 threat
DD = amount of nuke was the threat
Lifetap threat = double the DD component
Debuff around 400-450
Red Epic was known
DoT = about 1:1 for the sum total the dot would do? (this is the only one not understood)

Once you knew the basic general rule you could pretty easily estimate the threat of a proc by looking at the spell itself and breaking it down.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
  #25  
Old 04-06-2019, 12:35 PM
elwing elwing is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 1,194
Default

Aren't hate limited to 400 on any non-class spells?
  #26  
Old 04-06-2019, 12:42 PM
aaezil aaezil is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,754
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elwing [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Aren't hate limited to 400 on any non-class spells?
Pretty sure thats only the case for non damage procs
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx View Post
I tried my hand at rotating with the casuals.
It was at this point I decided to no longer be kind to the casuals as they have extreme short term memory. They did this to themselves, unfortunately.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maner View Post
No one in A/A cares that you aren't getting pixels. In fact after the last suspension wave the attitude is to stop letting the casual guilds get anything even remotely of value.
  #27  
Old 04-06-2019, 01:50 PM
DMN DMN is offline
Planar Protector

DMN's Avatar

Join Date: May 2016
Location: My own special hell
Posts: 3,364
Default

I remember back in kunark that tash stcks were really popular with raid warriors despite their bad ratio Maybe it was just in the offhand tho? Which makes me then wonder the simplicity of the hate estimations. Then again it might have just been done to make it easier facilitate the landing of mal and slow without having to have enchanters instagibbed tashing.
  #28  
Old 04-06-2019, 04:27 PM
Danth Danth is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aaezil [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pretty sure thats only the case for non damage procs
That was apparently the intent, at least according to the notes, but anyone who can cast a spell can tell you that spellthreat has has been changed across the board. Perhaps a glitch, perhaps not, but whatever the case the players need to deal with it.

Danth
  #29  
Old 04-07-2019, 10:34 AM
mizzbiscuits mizzbiscuits is offline
Aviak

mizzbiscuits's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 74
Default

“Haynar: Fixed a bug in adding hate from spells, that was introduced with the out of class spell hate cap. Spells with a specific hate adder, were losing their hate from the spell effects.”

...from just reading this without testing, sounds like a benefit for warriors? I’ve noticed even at tanking UR & MM that effects aren’t very snappy.
  #30  
Old 04-07-2019, 06:18 PM
ApexNews ApexNews is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 74
Default

numbers seem off but the cause is noble. if you have a reproducible test to gather data i would be willing to help. i have many high end pixels to test with.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.