#1
|
|||
|
/stand is non classic. /sit on /sit off are broken.
http://everquest.allakhazam.com/hist...es-2001-2.html
December 4, 2001 6:00 am - /stand now implemented. We've added this command because not everyone speaks programmer and would think that the logical reverse of /sit would be /sit off. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] /stand was not implemented until luclin release. The correct command at this point should be /sit off to force standing. Like wise /sit on should force sitting. At the moment /sit only works as a toggle, which is not classic. | ||
#2
|
|||
|
Devs don't deal with client stuff I think? Would have to change a few things on it's end to implement that seems like.
| ||
#3
|
|||
|
/sit off works btw :P
| ||
#4
|
|||
|
oh is it /sit on that is broken? let me go check!
Edit: yes, shame on me for relying on my memory, it is /sit on that is broken. It just toggles whether you are sitting, it should force you to sit (and not make you stand if already siting). | ||
Last edited by Jimjam; 04-07-2017 at 03:59 PM..
|
#5
|
|||
|
reported 3 years ago, no action [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...=stand+command | ||
#6
|
|||
|
I believe Caiu is correct in that this would require a client-side modification - wouldn't be a simple change in how the server receives that command, for example. That's also why most of the non-classic /help commands still "function" insofar as they elicit a response from the client even if the server doesn't respond to them.
| ||
#7
|
|||
|
In other words, nilbog needs to blackmail TAKP developers for their Trilogy-era client.
| ||
|
|