#1
|
|||
|
Ranger call of flame
Approaching late 40s on my ranger and considering doing this quest or paying the 2k plat for the call of flame spell when I am 50. However, with firestrike (DD nuke that does 100 more dmg) approaching at 52, I don't see much value in even getting call of flame. Am I missing something?
| ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Cast time is over 2x as long on firestrike
| ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
The MM part of the quest is rough; I think if you can find the spell <2k it might be worth it.
| ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Pref it to firestrike casting time is nice.
| ||
|
#5
|
|||
|
They do not share a cooldown - aka you can use both. Very useful while soloing or burning (haha!) HP on targets that need to die quickly. More than worth it, but I wouldn’t try soloing the quest until well past 49.
| ||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Call of Flame -> not worth the time you have to put into it. 18 Second Recast Time. , 25 mana less then firestrike, and does less dmg then firestrike. Just use firestrike!
| ||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
I can't remember using it more than a couple times just because it was shiny and cool If you are a completionist and want your spells for your level get it sure, but it will sit with eyes of the cat in your spell book never being used
__________________
60 Ranger and proud of it.
First Ranger Epic on P99 3rd place BotB | |||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Can a 52 ranger solo Vance for the final part? Mostly kunark bis with epics, sky cloak, fungi
__________________
Pint
| ||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Is it on a different timer to conflagration?
| ||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
My Ranger is similarly equipped @ 60 and even fully self buffed using a WeaponShield Disc during fight I was not able to get him to 20% before he got me to 20%. He summons so fight at ZL if you want to test yourself. Also rules out just bow-kiting him dead. A single Druid healing me though was all I needed to 1v1 him in melee.
__________________
"Extinction is the rule. Survival is the exception." -Carl Sagan
| |||
|
|
|