#31
|
|||
|
Personally I would be rid of them (as not classic), but I can sympathise staff including nonclassic touches that lowers their workload. Lucky for everyone here this idiot Jimjam doesn't get to call the shots!
| ||
|
#32
|
|||
|
Don't understand how this could be a CSR nightmare. Remove linking but keep the log message that states which item was added to the trade window.
Besides that, scamming IS against the rules. Very few people want to risk losing their accounts over easily detectable and logable scamming. If scamming was truly an issue on P99 (it's not), there would be a post outlining each possible scam, what to watch out for, and what to do about it. For the record I'm not for or against item links, I prefer the QoL stuff but I'd still play if they were removed. But yeah the pick-and-choose mentality 'round here is reminding me of every argument I've ever had with a Christian about the Bible. Always entertaining to see people's true selves!
__________________
Atomos Human Ranger <Divinity>
Atomos Human Bard | ||
|
#33
|
|||
|
Was hoping auctions would be all green text on green99 but oh well.
I prefer Wolf-hide sleves +2 str, get that dps up! Gossamer robe (white robe!), Golden Earstud +3 int!! To Wolf-Hide Sleeves - Gossamer Robe - Golden Ears-tud 1. its community first 2. immerses players with creative auctions 3. MACROS AGAIN god I miss macro auctions. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||
|
#34
|
|||
|
You know what? From now on I will make sure I only sell with macros.
| ||
|
#35
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#36
|
|||
|
Im going to go out on a limb and guess cd288 and Ahris have literally cried irl over pet windows.
| ||
|
#37
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#38
|
||||
|
Quote:
The core of what everyone likes about "classic" EQ is going to vary and you can't please everyone. My core is 1. Death means something 2. Travel is not instant and/or has a cost. 3. Not an endless skinner-box Sure, we're all working on levels and items, but it's generally slow rather than constant timed rewards every 10 minutes. You're putting work in. 4. Plenty of interaction with others good or bad. WoW feels like a single-player game. Any change that doesn't affect this is ok in my book. Making the UI less intuitive and useful seems really grognard to me. Just because we didn't know what good UI or player controls were in 1999 doesn't mean we should go back to it. Removing linking is just silly and doesn't affect aspects 1-4, but makes the game just a tiny % more tedious for no reason. There's overall a just a bunch of tiny QoL control and usability improvements I'd like to see. Like "Can I ctrl+m to meditate please?" Looking at the book doesn't bother me and kinda makes sense, you're suppose to be "meditating." | |||
|
#39
|
|||
|
Yeah thats why the hypocrisy is a bummer.
P99 staff changes a lot of things and says "eat dirt, its for classic" But then leaves things like linking in its current state and says "Well whatevs we like it" It would be nice if there was an actual vision. At the same time I have seen how forum posters here complain about everything and make demands about everything like they are owed something and it is pretty ridiculous. It would just be nice to know that 100% of all classic changes are trying to get into the game and eventually they all will. On red they disabled duck to instant stop casting, but left blue in titanium mode where ducks instantly interrupted. This was not a timeline issue, but they decided to leave it unclassic for unclassic reasons. Those kind of inconsistencies hurts the reputation of staff whether or not it matters Like others I have no idea how linking not existing would hurt CSR. | ||
|
#40
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|