#1
|
|||
|
Warrior or SK: which is more fun to level?
Of course I know there is no *objective* answer. Just curious to hear your experiences. Mostly looking at the 1-60 experience. And yes, imo feeling powerful rather than gimped is part of the fun (ogre master race for life).
| ||
|
#2
|
|||
|
I say warrior, at least on blue
| ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
I liked my warrior more than my SK, but in terms of "fun" I think having access to spells including invis, feign death, levitate or snare, fear... probably makes the SK more "fun if that's the question. My SK was much more self-dependent, solo-able and flexible.
Warrior is a much more straightforward beast... I truly enjoyed 1-30 but I couldn't go through the infamous 30-52 where you just suck at everything (pull, tank, travelling, solo, dps... name it, you suck). Supposedly at 52+ you start feeling the power. I might level her up again if I ever feel like it [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] TLDR to answer your question, my vote goes to Shadow Knight | ||
|
#4
|
|||
|
no love for pallys?
| ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
-Unkle Ruckus, the Erudite Enchanter
| |||
|
#6
|
|||
|
Myeah - I think it is very gear dependant, and even then you can't hold aggro against the Flash of Light or Disease Cloud boyz.
I did tank as well. This is the only thing a warrior can do hehe. I just don't think it tanks the best at 30-52. I understand it is different in raid situations, but you don't raid at 30-52. | ||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Depends what you like. If you want to be a great tank the SK is weak... its only advantage is spell aggro. But SK can be fun for other reasons (fear kite soloing, fd pulling, circlet insta-invis).
| ||
|
#9
|
|||
|
I have a 45 war and a 44 SK. I enjoyed the Warrior more. That being said. Paladins are better than either IMO. I have a 59 Paladin.
| ||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|