Average Player Population by Class and Level - data fun!

[Phased]

Tonight there was not a single 30-39 warrior, paladin, or SK for over an hour. After seeing that graph it definitely makes sense why.

[Bazia]

Originally Posted by Phased [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tonight there was not a single 30-39 warrior, paladin, or SK for over an hour. After seeing that graph it definitely makes sense why.

Because everyone is 50+?

[Phased]

Originally Posted by Bazia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because everyone is 50+?

Not sure what chart you're looking at, but there's over 50% more people that are 1-49 than 50+. Take away the EC mules and it's still greater, so I'm not sure how you define the word 'everyone'.

[fischsemmel]

There was only an average of 26 rp and/or anon characters out of 500+?

Not a chance.

[bigforest]

Originally Posted by fischsemmel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There was only an average of 26 rp and/or anon characters out of 500+?

Not a chance.

I couldn't believe it either - maybe I shouldn't have jumped to that conclusion.

But why at all times was the pop number on project1999.org 20 or so higher than the total number of /who all counts? Guides /GMS?

[Boombha]

I think what you did is amazing, so /anon numbers are right or not, isn't much of the point, it gives a nice representation of the server.

For those of us geeky types who like numbers and graphs, it's pretty cool!

[DoucLangur]

Originally Posted by bigforest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There was an average discrepancy of 26 players between the population number on project1999.org and the total sum of all /who all class count, so I don't believe it counts anon.

Unless there's another explanation?

Are you sure it wasn't just the discrepancy between people logging on and off while you were doing your /who all checks?

[MissingNo]

What's up with all the druids considering what people say about them not really desirable for groups 50+? Is it just people's farmers? If that's the case, why is it so much higher than necros or shaman or enchanters?

[bigforest]

Originally Posted by DoucLangur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you sure it wasn't just the discrepancy between people logging on and off while you were doing your /who all checks?

Pretty confident it isn't, since I mapped buttons to do the checks and with everything windowed it takes less than a minute to enter the data into google docs.

I might have assumed that the website population number was just not refreshed (seems like it is every 15 mins or so), but since I did it at 6pm when pop numbers are trending up and at 1am when pop numbers are trending down I don't think this is the case either.

[john_savage1982]

Originally Posted by bigforest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pretty confident it isn't, since I mapped buttons to do the checks and with everything windowed it takes less than a minute to enter the data into google docs.

I might have assumed that the website population number was just not refreshed (seems like it is every 15 mins or so), but since I did it at 6pm when pop numbers are trending up and at 1am when pop numbers are trending down I don't think this is the case either.

You mean you don't automate this from the log file?